12 Barking Up The Wrong Tree The Surprising Science Behind Why Everything You Know About Success Is (Mostly) Wrong - Good grades in school- likely to be a "rule follower", and less likely to be innovative, think outside the box. - Introverts are more likely to be experts, extroverts tend to make more money (socializing, "networking"). We should look at "networking" as "making friends". This disputes the "nice guys finish last"... - Match your strengths/ passion/ skill to the right context. - Flattery (sucking up to the boss) can work in the short term, but in the end, when people see their colleagues/ neighbors/ etc cutting corners and reaping benefits, this leads to a general collapse into distrust and rule-breaking. - IQ only matters up to a certain point, but then it yields diminishing returns. After that, hard work is what makes the difference. - Tradeoffs- every hour that you spend working is an hour spent away from other things (family, hobbies). In this age of constant accessibility, you have to decide to leave work behind (ignore your emails when you're at your kid's ball game). - Gratitude in relationships- on their deathbed, people regret working too much and not saying thanks to the people in their life. - Some helpful things I learned...please note that tact and delivery matter and these are not appropriate in every scenario. - When someone is getting upset or frustrated and starts yelling, "Please speak more slowly, I want to help." Or try, "What would you like me to do?" - When someone is upset, validate/ name their feeling. "Sounds like you’re angry/ hurt/ frustrated." If you're wrong, give them the chance to correct you. - Gratitude to relationships. Previous Next

< Back Pack the Guts https://video.wixstatic.com/video/3b6ff6_f29c38a601b645459ef002f51792fc87/1080p/mp4/file.mp4 Previous Next

4 Trauma References General Reference GCS .pdf Download PDF • 78KB Injury Severity Scores .pdf Download PDF • 195KB Snakebite Severity Score .pdf Download PDF • 102KB Staplers.Sutures.Mesh .pdf Download PDF • 530KB Hemostatic Agents .pdf Download PDF • 18KB TEG .pdf Download PDF • 12KB TBI Brain Injury Guidelines .pdf Download PDF • 213KB Brain Trauma Foundation .pdf Download PDF • 148KB DVT in TBI .pdf Download PDF • 137KB Spinal Cord ASIA Score .pdf Download PDF • 1.98MB

Common Measurement Conversions < Back Kitchen Hacks #3 Common Measurement Conversions Powdered Milk Reconstitution Use volume of water equivalent to desired milk volume. 1 Cup Milk= 3 Tbsp Powdered Milk= 45 mL 3/4 Cup Milk = 2.25 Tbsp Powdered Milk 2/3 Cup Milk = 2 Tbsp Powdered Milk= 30 mL 1/2 Cup Milk = 1.5 Tbsp Powdered Milk 1/3 Cup Milk = 1 Tbsp Powdered Milk= 15 mL 1/4 Cup Milk = 3/4 Tbsp Powdered Milk Measuring Spoon Conversions 1/2 tsp= 2.5 mL 1 tsp= 5 mL 1 + 1/2 tsp= 1/2 Tbsp= 7.5 mL 2 tsp= 10 mL 3 tsp= 1 Tbsp 6 tsp= 2 Tbsp= 1/8 c Liquid Measurement Conversions 1 fluid ounce= 2 Tbsp= 6 tsp 2 fluids ounces= 4 Tbsp= 1/4 cup 2+2/3 fluid ounces= 5 Tbsp + 1 tsp= 1/3 cup 4 fluid ounces= 8 Tbsp= 1/2 cup 6 fluid ounces= 3/4 cup 8 fluid ounces= 1 cup 16 fluid ounces= 2 cups= 1 pint 4 cups= 2 pints= 1 quart 4 quarts= 1 gallon Substitute dry for fresh spices 1:3 of dry:fresh 1 tsp dry= 1 Tbsp fresh Previous Next

[Editorial inspired by @kari_jerge] Why Don't They Believe Us? < Back [Editorial inspired by @kari_jerge] Seen on Twitter recently: Troll: I demand pictures of your full ICU to prove to me it’s full Female surgeon: None of us owes you a damn thing. Especially not pictures that will get us fired. But I’ll get right on that… What do you do if you accidentally injure yourself while working or making home improvements? Do you call 911 or have someone drive you to the ER? What do you do if you have high blood pressure, or diabetes, or depression? Do you go to a primary care doctor? What do you do if you have severe arthritic hip pain that doesn't resolve with conservative (non-operative) management? Do you consider talking to an orthopedic surgery about a hip replacement? I don't know what portion of the population inherently trust the medical community, but for the remainder of this editorial, I will presume that it's a majority. For those that don't, this doesn't apply. If you don't trust modern medicine, I won't convince you that you should trust our reports about this pandemic. Let's assume you accept modern medicine, including visiting the emergency department, having a primary care doctor, taking prescription medicine, and any of the other various diagnostic tests, consultations, and treatments. If this is the case, why would you think we would voluntarily try to deceive you about the capacity and occupancy of our ICU facilities? Why would so many medical community leaders actively speak out with a nearly singular voice to spread a lie? Ranging from the widely known Dr. Sanjay Gupta to a wide assortment of medical providers in many specialties. We have nothing to gain from building this whole façade. This isn't just a few people speaking up. This is a monumental effort to warn people. Social media has given a voice- and many have worked very hard to dispel the myths spread by many loud voices that continue to spread falsehoods. We have nothing to gain. You trust us to save your life when you have a heart attack, need emergency surgery, or care for you when you're severely ill from any matter of diseases. We haven't changed as a community to collectively spread these myths. It really is as bad as we say. We genuinely don't get paid more for patients who die from COVID. We don't have adequate PPE. We aren't lying. If you continue to deny reality, we will still care for you or your family and friends, in the unfortunate case you become ill, because that's what we do. We are just hoping that we will have the resources you need. And if we stretch our personnel any thinner, we will not have enough nurses and providers to care for you. We are the last hope. Don't make choices you'll regret. Previous Next

< Back Stabbed in the Right Thigh A 42-year-old male is brought to the Emergency Department as a Level 1 trauma activation for a stab wound to the right thigh. He was hypotensive before arrival, with SBP in the 70s-80s. Estimated blood loss of 500 mL on the scene. On arrival, the patient is awake and argumentative. His blood pressure is 90 systolic. On a rapid secondary survey, there is no evidence of any other wounds. There is a tourniquet in place to right upper thigh. When the tourniquet is released, there is arterial bleeding from the wound and there is no palpable distal pulse. What do you need to do before leaving the trauma bay? Replace tourniquet. Call OR to have vascular instrument set available, as well as massive transfusion, cell saver, etc. Type and cross for blood transfusion. After ensuring a type and cross, we proceeded to the operating room. How do you want to prep and drape the patient? Any instructions for anesthesia? Wide prep and drape to ensure adequate access for proximal and distal control- this includes prepping the lower abdomen for possible iliac exposure. Also, need to prep contralateral lower extremity for potential saphenous vein harvest. Ultrasound localization of the saphenous prior to prepping can allow identification of the larger vein. Anesthesia will need to monitor hemodynamics and volume status and be prepared for volume resuscitation with blood. In addition, they will have to be vigilant for the repercussion syndrome, the metabolic disturbance following the re-establishment of arterial flow (washout of toxins following ischemia). We placed a pneumatic tourniquet on the patient's upper thigh. We prepped and draped from the umbilicus to the knees, and also prepped and draped the contralateral thigh to have access in case a saphenous vein harvest was required for repair. We made an incision directly over the wound and dissected down to the artery. There was a single wound in the anterior surface of the distal superficial femoral artery. Proximal and distal control was obtained after circumferentially dissecting and placing vessel loops. The artery was divided and spatulated. It was repaired with an end to end tension-free anastomosis. Following arterial repair, we performed a lower extremity fasciotomy. Management of Penetrating Arterial Trauma WTA Algorithm Diagnostic Workup Hard signs- pulsatile bleeding, thrill, bruit, expanding hematoma, pulse deficit, cold pale limb. These patients require operative intervention. A few exceptions can benefit from preoperative imaging to document the presence and location of associated arterial injuries: wounds in the thoracic inlet, shotgun wounds in the extremities, and segmental fractures or fractures at different levels of an extremity. Soft signs- history of pulsatile bleeding, wound near an artery, non-expanding hematoma, neuro deficit, weak pulse, proximity injury. These patients need further workup to evaluate for the presence of arterial injury. An ankle-brachial index should be performed, and if ≤0.9, CT angiography is indicated. If ABI >0.9- no further w/u needed. ABI <0.9- CTA. Principles of arterial repair 1. Plan incision to facilitate proximal and distal control. 2. Ensure adequate back bleeding. Fogarty to remove distal thrombus. 3. Tension-free anastomosis. Adequate lumen. Clean margins. Don't create more damage to the vessel. 3. Consider risk/ benefit of heparinization. Systemic dose: 70-100 units/kg IV. Regional dose: 50U/ml x50 mL. 4. Completion angiogram to document repair. There are various techniques for creating an anastomosis, but the basic principles must be maintained. Recently, I was taught a useful technique [Dr. Feliciano, AAST 2020 Virtual Conference] that prevents tension at one point along the anastomosis. A parachute technique, starting with loosely approximated sutures on the back wall, followed by parachuting the two ends close to continue the suture on the anterior surface of the artery. Indications for fasciotomy include prolonged limb ischemia (>6 hours), combined arterial and venous injuries. 1. Feliciano DV. Evaluation and Management of Peripheral Vascular Injury. Part 1. Western Trauma Association/Critical Decisions in Trauma. J Trauma. 2011;70(6):1551-1555. 2. Feliciano DV. Pitfalls in the management of peripheral vascular injuries . Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2017;2:1–8. Parachute Technique [Feliciano] WTA Algorithm for Peripheral Vascular Trauma Previous Next

< Back Postoperative hypotension A 35-year-old male is in the ICU following emergency surgery for a small bowel obstruction. On arrival to the ICU, he has the following vital signs: HR 115, BP 85/40, SpO2 98. He underwent a 4-hour open lysis of adhesions. He received 2L of crystalloid and made 50 mL of dark urine, and did not require any medication to improve his blood pressure. He remains intubated and sedated. What is the differential for his hypotension? Hypovolemia- under-resuscitation relative to the insensible losses from open abdomen and likely preoperative dehydration Sepsis- bacteremia from gut translocation from small bowel obstruction, pneumonia from aspiration due to obstruction Tamponade, tension pneumothorax- did he have any intra-vascular devices placed in the OR? Pulmonary embolism- lengthy surgery, did he have appropriate mechanical prophylaxis? Cardiomyopathy The surgical team reports that he has not been tolerating a diet, or even liquids, for the previous 3 days. He received perioperative ertapenem for surgical infection prophylaxis. There was no evidence of aspiration during intubation and his admission CXR was unremarkable. He had a right internal jugular central line placed intra-operatively. He had no issues with oxygenation/ ventilation or high airway pressures intra-operatively. How can you diagnose shock and differentiate between the different potential etiologies? Physical exam- evaluation of skin turgor/ color/ temperature and mucous membranes, evaluation of fluid status (open wounds, nasogastric tube output, passive leg raise), examination of urine quality, auscultation of heart/ lungs Labs- cultures, complete blood count, lactate, liver function tests, BUN/Cr Ultrasound- gross evaluation of heart function, lung sliding to rule out pneumothorax, volume and collapsibility of the inferior vena cava Test for fluid responsiveness- based on stroke volume variation (SVV, see below), or response to passive leg raise or a fluid challenge. On exam, he is tachycardic without murmurs, lungs have equal air movement bilaterally. His nasogastric tube remains on suction with ongoing high output of gastric contents. On ultrasound, he has bilateral lung sliding. His cardiac contractility looks grossly preserved. He has normal oxygenation. His inferior vena cava is collapsible. He has a known source of infection (positive blood cultures), leukocytosis, elevated lactate, high fluid losses with evidence of fluid responsiveness. Shock: Undifferentiated Hypotension Hypotension ≠ shock. So what is shock? Inadequate perfusion to maintain end-organ function Pathophysiology: effective perfusion requires adequate cardiac output (CO). CO is the volume of blood that the heart pumps each minute, and it depends on stroke volume (SV; the volume of blood ejected with each heartbeat) and heart rate (HR; the number of heartbeats per minute). SV depends on preload (intra-vascular volume returning to the heart), myocardial contractility, and afterload (systemic vascular resistance). Shock is a disruption of preload, contractility, and/ or afterload. Signs of shock= signs of end-organ hypoperfusion Altered mental status (brain) Decreased urine output (kidney) Change in color/ temperature of extremities (skin) Abnormal liver function tests (liver) Ileus (gastrointestinal tract) Diagnosis of shock + tools for monitoring response to treatment Elevated lactate (global hypoperfusion) Ultrasound- evaluate cardiac function, evaluated IVC to assess volume status Minimally invasive cardiac monitoring (central line or arterial line)- CVP and SVV to assess volume status Invasive cardiac monitoring (pulmonary artery catheter)- cardiac output, ScVO2 (central venous oxygen saturation) Four types of shock Shock is typically categorized as hypovolemic, obstructive, cardiogenic or distributive. However, in order to link the specific category with the associated pathophysiology, I have described each state as it relates to maintaining cardiac output, as described above. Decreased preload: hypovolemic shock- low circulating blood volume→ decreased blood volume returning to the heart. Etiologies: bleeding, inadequate fluid replacement/ maintenance, high output from nasogastric tube or ostomy, insensible losses that aren't appropriately replaced (burn patients, large open wounds). Decreased preload: obstructive shock- disease process that impedes venous return to the heart (tamponade, tension pneumothorax, pulmonary embolism). Decreased contractility: cardiogenic shock- disturbance of the intrinsic function of the heart. Etiologies: heart failure, arrhythmias, valvular insufficiency, or decompensated valvular stenosis. Decreased afterload: distributive shock- dilated peripheral vasculature, sometimes known as vasoplegia. Etiologies: sepsis, anaphylaxis, neurogenic following spinal cord injury (NOTE- this is NOT the same as spinal shock), burns, trauma, pancreatitis. Neurogenic- hypotension with concurrent bradycardia. Vasoplegia is a term used to describe pathologically low systemic vascular resistance- this can be associated with post-cardiac bypass or any of the other causes mentioned here. Management of shock Treat underlying cause (see below). Restore adequate intravascular volume (aka preload). This is part of the initial treatment of hypovolemic shock, obstructive shock, and distributive shock. Fluids in the management of cardiogenic shock depend on the primary cardiac pathology. Treat hypotension/ decreased cardiac output that persists despite fluid resuscitation and treatment of the underlying cause. Septic shock- norepinephrine is the first line vasoactive medication. Monitor end-points of resuscitation (see above, Diagnosis of shock + tools for monitoring response to treatment ) Supportive care- nutrition, respiratory support, venous thromboembolism, etc. Specific Treatments Based on Etiology Hypovolemia from hemorrhage- transfusion, stop the bleeding Hypovolemia from fluid losses- replace fluid via enteral or intravenous route, as appropriate Sepsis- antibiotics, control source of infection (appendectomy, drain placement, etc). Tamponade- drainage of pericardial fluid (pericardiocentesis, pericardial window) Tension pneumothorax- release of tension physiology (needle decompression or finger thoracostomy) Cardiogenic- management of primary cardiac pathology, whether that entails treating acutely decompensated heart failure, resolving acute symptomatic arrhythmias, etc. Previous Next

< Back Abdominal Pain- Renal Disease A 72-year-old male with multiple medical co-morbidities presents with several weeks of right-sided abdominal pain. His family reports he hasn't been eating or drinking much. He has a slightly altered mental status and was unable to provide any more detailed history of his symptoms, such as aggravating/ alleviating factors or the relationship of his pain to meals. His medical history is significant for poorly controlled diabetes with neuropathy and renal insufficiency. He has not seen a primary care provider in over 6 months. On exam, he is uncomfortable but not in acute distress. His heart rate is in the 100s, and his blood pressure is normal. He is febrile to 101. He has dry mucous membranes. He has tenderness in the right upper quadrant with a positive Murphys sign. His exam was otherwise unremarkable. Workup? Imaging- right upper quadrant ultrasound Laboratory evaluation- CBC, basic metabolic panel, AST/ALT, bilirubin His labs are remarkable for mild leukocytosis and an elevated Cr (baseline 1.2, currently 2). Imaging was remarkable for cholelithiasis and gallbladder thickening. The EGS team is consulted and the patient is admitted to the surgical ICU given his acute on chronic renal insufficiency. What are the possible etiologies of his renal insufficiency and the initial treatment strategies based on the underlying cause? Pre-renal causes, such as hypovolemia, lead to decreased renal perfusion. Treatment involves volume repletion. Intra-renal causes, such as medication and acute tubular necrosis from sepsis, requires treatment of the underlying cause concurrent with volume repletion, treatment of electrolyte derangements and avoiding further nephrotoxin exposure. Post-renal causes, such as kidney stones or foley catheter malfunction, require relief of the obstruction. Based on the patient's history of decreased oral intake, he is at risk for acute hypovolemia, which can worsen his baseline chronic renal insufficiency. He was treated with volume resuscitation and close monitoring of his urine output. When should he undergo cholecystectomy? If cholecystitis was the precipitating cause, he would likely continue to worsen if his surgery was postponed. If hypovolemia was the precipitating cause, it would benefit from volume resuscitation, which can be administered throughout the operative course. If his renal insufficiency was not an acute change, and it was a slow decline since his last clinic visit, it was unlikely to significantly improve in a short time. The ICU team, EGS team and anesthesiology discussed the risks versus benefits of proceeding with surgery. Regardless of the etiology, postponing his surgery would be unlikely to improve his operative risk profile. We proceeded with laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and he returned to the ICU postoperatively for ongoing resuscitation and monitoring. Management of Renal Failure The causes of renal failure can be categorized into pre-renal, intra-renal, or post-renal. Acute infection can precipitate renal insufficiency, which is associated with poorer outcomes. Pre-Renal Caused by hypovolemia (dehydration) from decreased intake, nausea/ vomiting, excessive diuresis, third-spacing from acute inflammatory processes (pancreatitis), blood loss, inadequate replacement of insensible losses. The common final etiology in pre-renal causes is decreased renal perfusion. Treatment- volume replacement. Intra-Renal Multiple different intra-renal causes, including vascular or micro-vascular etiologies, glomerular disease, and interstitial disease (acute tubular necrosis, medications, and various precipitates such as myoglobin and crystals). The most common acute causes are medication and ATN from ischemic/ sepsis. Treatment involves management of the underlying etiology and supportive care. Post-Renal Caused by any obstruction from the renal pelvis to the urethra, including kidney stones, malignancy (can obstruct anywhere from the ureter to the bladder), retroperitoneal fibrosis, prostate enlargement, blood clots in the bladder or foley catheter malfunction. Treatment involves relief of the obstruction. Acute Cholecystitis with Renal Dysfunction Diabetes and severe cholecystitis (Grade III- organ dysfunction) are risk factors for increased mortality in patients with acute cholecystitis.[1] As noted in the discussion above, it is crucial to weigh the risks and benefits of operative intervention. If there is a modifiable risk factor, such as an acute cardiac event that is amenable to intervention. Escartin A et al. Acute Cholecystitis in Very Elderly Patients: Disease Management, Outcomes, and Risk Factors for Complications. Surgery Research and Practice. 2019;2019:9709242. Previous Next

And You Really Should be Nice to People It's a Small World < Back And You Really Should be Nice to People The medical community is incredibly small and interconnected. This can be very beneficial, but can also create challenges if interpersonal discord arises. Word travels fast and it's easy to burn bridges. In the medical field, there is a palpable tension between certain specialties. Not every hospital has the same procedure for managing trauma. However, in the countless hospitals I've worked in, clinicians in Emergency Medicine and Trauma Surgery work hand in hand to manage severely injured trauma patients. We have different training experiences and different management styles. When we (Trauma Surgery) come down to the trauma bay to evaluate a patient, we are a visitor. Yes, in a busy hospital, we might be incredibly frequent visitors. But still, we are guests in another department's home. Despite the best intentions, and perhaps even because of varying perspectives on what is "the best" intention, it is not a surprise that the trauma bay can serve as a breeding ground for animosity,(1) unless there are deliberate efforts to prevent conflict. Thankfully, creating a common language and developing standard practices is possible through mutually developed protocols, as well as principles in ATLS. This is crucial to effective patient care. I am grateful that I completed my Acute Care Surgery fellowship at a hospital system with a phenomenal relationship with our Emergency Department colleagues. I won't exaggerate and deny any conflicts, but there was a culture of mutual respect and a common goal of optimal patient care that I had never experienced before. Why Does It Matter? I started this post to share a story of why it's important to be nice to everyone you encounter. I mean, besides the fact that I believe that we should be kind and compassionate to everyone. At one facility that I worked, there was a less than friendly relationship between surgery and the emergency department. Again, I will confess that I likely had several of my own negative interactions. However, my general principle is based on what I described above. I consider my behavior and attitude to be at least a basic level of respect and decency to the providers that I interacted with. In contrast to unpleasant providers, I appeared to be above average. About 5 years ago, I was preparing for a deployment. I had the misfortune of being attacked by several dogs and required a series of rabies vaccines, which delayed my medical clearance. Thankfully, one of the ER providers from my hospital was at pre-deployment with me. He called a senior medical officer and obtained clearance so I could proceed without delay. It would have been easy for me to dismiss this provider during any of our countless interactions. If I had been consistently less pleasant, I suspect that he would have maintained a basic level of decency despite my poor behavior. But it's unlikely that he would have extended himself to advocate on my behalf. You never know what interaction could make the difference, so we should be nice to everyone. 1. Why Can't Emergency Medicine and Surgery Just Get Along? EmCrit Podcast. Previous Next

The Challenges of Being A Female (Acute Care) Surgeon Are you sure? < Back The Challenges of Being A Female (Acute Care) Surgeon My 17-year journey to become an Acute Care Surgeon started when I applied for medical school in my senior year of high school. I went to a 6-year combined-degree medical school and then completed a 6-year surgical residency. At age 29, I began my practice as a General Surgeon. After 3 years as a Staff Surgeon, during which I had one combat deployment and one medical readiness exercise in Africa, I then chose to complete an acute care surgery fellowship. Our acute care surgery department was comprised of 14 surgeons, only 3 of whom were female. Surgery has historically been a male-dominated specialty, and female surgeons continue to face significant obstacles.(1) There has been a noticeable shift with more females choosing surgical specialties, although they continue to be under-represented in trauma. This can create a sense of rivalry or competition, the need to be seen as equally competent as our male colleagues. On top of the difficulties inherent to surgical training and practice, the constant pressure to live up to expectations can foster stress and doubt. Imposter syndrome, which is "a psychological pattern in which people doubt their accomplishments and have a persistent, often internalized fear of being exposed as a ‘fraud’," can result.(2) Are You Sure This is What you Want to Do? Twelve years ago, during my internship, I was in the process of reapplying for the remaining 5 years of my surgical residency (a phenomenon that was subsequently eliminated from military surgery residencies). As I asked one of the senior (male) surgeons for a letter of recommendation, he discussed the issue with me in the middle of a busy clinic, with other residents and staff present. He asked if I was sure I wanted to do a surgery residency, and he encouraged me to consider other career paths. Thankfully, I did not experience this discrimination from any of my other staff. But I do wonder if there was discrimination of omission...were my male co-residents provided encouragement or advantages that I was not afforded? In my small residency, with a total of 18 residents, we had a total of 5 females during my first year, including another female intern. I felt encouraged that 2/3 of my class was female, but this was the exception and not the rule. Eight years ago, during my surgical residency, I was at a very busy Level 1 trauma center. I can't recall the exact ratio of male to female surgeons, but I know women were in the minority. During a non-emergent trauma case, there was a product representative in the room. During a casual conversation, he was clarifying who was the surgeon. When the senior surgeon in the room (a female), introduced herself, he actually stated "Oh I didn't know women could be trauma surgeons." In an article published in the American Journal of Surgery in 2019, half of all hospitals with emergency general surgery services reported no female surgeons. For the subset of hospitals with EGS services who have an ACS Model, they reported a higher median proportion of women surgeons (17%).(3) Specifically in trauma surgery, women are still under-represented. 28% of surgeons who are board-certified in critical care are female. Thankfully, our voice is gaining strength. More women are going into surgical disciplines, and there are more woman in leadership positions in surgical organizations.(4) 29% of EAST members and 13% of AAST members are female, although there has been an increase in female executive leaders in AAST.(5) "Why should women have to sound like men to get people to listen to them? Why isn't it that everyone in the room should be quiet when she asks for quiet because she is a doctor asking for quiet?" "The theme was clear. Women physicians do not get the same respect men get when dealing with emergencies."(6) Women bring unique strengths to this discipline. It's not a matter of competing to prove that we are superior, but women are inherently different from men and this should be nurtured, not belittled, or ridiculed. Improved communication and patient engagement are just a few of the benefits we can bring to the team. Researchers Find Women Make Better Surgeons Than Men . "The authors attribute the favorable patient outcomes to the female doctors’ ability to communicate and engage with their patients to ensure compliance with medications and therapy, their adeptness at collaborating with colleagues and their tendency to adhere to guidelines when treating patients." This is not a simple problem, and it won't have a simple solution. So what can you do to combat the stereotypes and respectfully establish and maintain your position comparable to your male surgical colleagues? I've learned a few things over the years, with a handful of specific things over the years of my fellowship. Introduce yourself with your Title and name. Previously, I introduced myself as "Christina, part of the surgical team". I regarded my introduction as a display of humility. But I was actually unintentionally undermining my role in the team. I now introduce myself as "Dr ----, one of the trauma surgeons/ acute care surgeons" or "Dr ----, the trauma surgeon/ acute care surgeon who will be taking care of you." Find your team. Seek out mentors, or be a mentor for a younger trainee. Seek support from those who have led the way in this specialty. Get involved. This can be done at all levels, from hospital-level leadership and committee membership, city/ state/ national trauma organizations/ associations Counteract the negative thoughts that can accompany Imposter Syndrome. Keep a list of your strengths and the reason why you chose this specialty. 1. Stamp N. I'm a female surgeon. I feel uncomfortable telling girls they can be one, too. Washington Post. 29 July 2019. 2. McGuire K. Imposter Syndrome: The Dirty Little Secret of Successful Women (And Men Too). Association of Women Surgeons. 3 April 2019. 3. Oslock WM, Paredes AZ, Baselice HE, et al. Women surgeons and the emergence of acute care surgery programs. Am J Surg. 2019;218(4):803-808. 4. Haskins J. Where are all the women in surgery? Association of American Medical Colleges. 15 July 2019. 5. Foster SM, Knight J, Velopulos CG, et al. Gender distribution and leadership trends in trauma surgery societies. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2020;5(1):1-5. 6. Riley, Edward. Voices in the OR: A Self-Reflection and Examination of Unconscious Bias. Doximity. 28 Oct 2020. Previous Next

< Back Machete Attack- Neck Trauma A 42-year-old male was brought from an outside hospital after sustaining deep, extensive penetrating wounds to the neck and forearms. When he arrived at the hospital, we noted defensive wounds on his forearms and a deep laceration across the anterior neck. The report from EMS was that the patient was assaulted with a machete. What are the management priorities? Prioritize primary and secondary survey and treat life-threatening injuries first. Don't be distracted with impressive wounds. Secure the airway and control active hemorrhage. He was initially seen at a small community hospital, where an endotracheal tube was placed through the tracheal wound, and then he was transferred to our facility. He was rapidly transported to the operating room for evaluation. What structures need to be evaluated? Vascular structures (carotid arteries, vertebral arteries, jugular veins) and upper airway/ digestive structures (esophagus, pharynx). The head and neck team was consulted, and they evaluated him in the operating room. The wound's extent was explored thoroughly. Surprisingly, there were no injuries to the vascular structures, and the injury was isolated to the airway. The endotracheal tube was exchanged for a formal tracheostomy and a stent was placed in the upper airway to prevent luminal narrowing while the repair healed. The wound was closed in layers. Management of Penetrating Neck Trauma WTA Algorithm Anatomy Zone 1 Clavicles/ sternum to cricoid Zone 2 Cricoid to angle of mandible Zone 3 Angle of the mandible to the skull base Hard signs- airway compromise, massive subcutaneous emphysema/air bubbling through the wound, expanding or pulsatile hematoma/ active bleeding, shock, neurologic deficit, hematemesis. Soft signs- hemoptysis, blood in the oropharynx, dyspnea, dysphagia, dysphonia, subcutaneous air, chest tube air leak, non-expanding hematoma, bruit/ thrill. Hard signs or hemodynamic instability→ ensure airway and transport to OR. No immediate operative indications? Depends on symptoms and the zone of injury. Zone 1 and 3- CTA to rule out vascular and aerodigestive injuries; assess the trajectory of injury. Injury→ repair. Concerning trajectory→ triple endoscopy (laryngoscopy, bronchoscopy, and esophagoscopy). Zone 2- symptomatic→ OR. Asymptomatic- serial exams or imaging. Operative approach The most common incision for exploration of neck wounds is along the anterior border of the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscle. Exposure of Zone 1 and 3 are more challenging and endovascular adjuncts are useful. Zone 1 may require median sternotomy with extension along the SCM. Zone 3 requires mobilization of the mandible. Zone 2 can be approached with a transverse cervical collar incision with SCM extension. - Tracheal injuries are repaired with monofilament absorbable suture. - Esophageal injury- debride unhealthy edges, ensure full exposure of mucosal defect, repair defect (single or double layer), buttress with SCM, or strap muscle. Place drain. - Combined tracheoesophageal injury- repair, and ensure repairs are isolated with interposition of a well-vascularized muscle flap. Previous Next

6 Tips to Be More Comfortable with Uncomfortable Conversations Giving Bad News < Back 6 Tips to Be More Comfortable with Uncomfortable Conversations It's not fun to tell families (or patients) that there was a complication, that their loved one died, or that their loved one is not going to survive. But it's a fundamental principle of good patient care, especially in the specialties of trauma and critical care. I didn't become truly comfortable with these conversations until my critical care fellowship. After many years and countless conversations in private rooms, here are my tips on how to develop this skill. 1. Experience. It's uncomfortable, but you should take every opportunity to participate in these conversations, starting as a student/ trainee. - As a young resident, I remember walking with my attending to go talk to a family about an intra-operative complication. I'll never forget the sinking feeling in my chest, the shame that I made a mistake. This was a pivotal moment in my training. My attending didn't have to tell me I messed up. But he knew I needed to see how he handled disclosing to the family members. He showed me that this wasn't something that I should allow to crush my self-confidence. - A few years later, during one of my first trauma rotations, I remember sitting in a small room in the ER as one of my co-residents told a family that their child was the victim of a fatal shooting. I didn't have much experience telling families that their loved one had died. In particular, I didn't have any exposure to telling a family that their loved one died in a trauma bay- a family I'd never met, a family who never had a chance to see their loved one before they died from their injuries. I was initially embarrassed that my co-resident, who was one year younger than me, was more comfortable leading the discussion than I was. But then I realized he had much more exposure to that type of conversation because of his previous trauma rotations. So I took it as an opportunity to learn and prepare myself to lead the conversation the next time. - Two years later, in the ICU waiting room of the same hospital where I watched my (younger) co-resident tell a family their son died, I sat with the mother of a young man who was critically injured. Thankfully, I had much better news. But still, it's not easy to tell a single mother that her oldest son was shot through the chest, and was laying in the ICU, intubated, with an open chest and abdomen. 2. Learn from watching experts. - Everyone has a slightly different style of handling these conversations. I joined my attendings for every conversation I had the opportunity to witness. This included conversations about everything from Code Blue incidents to fatal injuries and end-of-life care. It's important to see different styles, which will allow you to develop your style. Some are more blunt, some are more observant of family dynamics, some are overly talkative. There are some you may choose to not replicate, but it's important to see a spectrum of styles to learn what works for you. - I've watched my MICU attending talk with the wife of a man who came to the hospital with acute cardiac arrest, requiring emergent coronary angiography and intervention, then therapeutic hypothermia. I learned how to succinctly describe a complex situation and support a wife make a crucial decision without pressuring her. - I've watched my trauma attending talk to a family of a young male patient who had died on the operating table. I've watched that talk more than once, unfortunately. And it never got more comfortable. But I learned how to convey devastating news while simultaneously expressing compassion. 3. Practice. - As a fellow, I would often have a pre-brief with my attending and we would discuss key points for the meeting, as well as the goals of the discussion (ie deciding about proceeding with surgery, deciding about comfort care, etc). - When I have younger residents who are having family meetings, particularly one's that I haven't worked with before, I have them rehearse their conversations with me before. I did this as a resident and a fellow, and I still do this with my fellows. 4. Get feedback. Positive feedback is always nice, but true constructive feedback is key to improving. - I've had nurses and chaplains who have joined me for multiple family meetings, and it's always reaffirming to hear them compliment my interaction. - My attendings still occasionally joined me in conversations toward the end of my fellowship. It was always helpful to hear feedback about what was well-received and how I could have been more effective. 5. Once you've practiced, developed your style, and absorbed feedback- don't expect it to always be easy. - Towards the end of my fellowship, I had a particularly challenging case. I had already had countless family discussions and had become very comfortable with being uncomfortable. For a variety of reasons, I was emotionally overwhelmed with this patient's situation- I sat and cried at the nurse's station for a long time. Then I went and talked to my attending and told her I couldn't have the conversation, that I couldn't stop crying. I was hoping she would take over and lead the conversation- I should have known I wouldn't get off that easily. She reassured me that I wouldn't have to say much- I had already established rapport with the patient's family the day before, and they'd be able to tell from my non-verbal communication that I didn't have good news. It was (and still is) the hardest conversation I've had. 6. Don't Stifle Your Emotions (within reason) - Some people would criticize me for expressing emotion when having discussions with families. I do think there has to be a healthy separation, and getting emotionally invested with every case would be paralyzing. I don't cry during the majority of these conversations. However, I'm not a robot, and I still occasionally have patients that affect me on a more personal level. For example, I had one family that came to the very difficult decision to transition their mother to comfort care. Their mother was the matriarch of the family and her children didn't want to disrespect her. She had expressed that she would not want to be kept alive if she couldn't continue to have meaningful interactions and care for the family. I told them that giving them the implicit approval to allow her to die peacefully was probably the greatest gift she could have given them, and I reassured them that they were showing her the ultimate level of respect and kindness by honoring her wishes. That hit me differently because I could feel their pain as I imagined myself in their position. Previous Next