top of page

Search

197 results found with an empty search

  • Thai Chicken Enchiladas | Doc on the Run

    < Back Thai Chicken Enchiladas Ingredients 8 flour tortillas 2 cooked and shredded chicken breasts 1 Tbsp canola oil 1/2 sweet onion, chopped 1/3 C chopped/shredded carrots 1/2 C chopped/shredded cabbage (premade coleslaw mix works well) 4 garlic cloves, minced 1/2 tsp salt 1/2 tsp pepper 4 green onions, sliced 1/3 C chopped peanuts (more for garnish) 1/4 C chopped fresh cilantro (more for garnish) 2 1/2 C light coconut milk 1/3 C + 1/2 C sweet chili sauce Instructions 1. Preheat oven to 350 degrees F. 2. Heat oil in large skillet over medium heat. Add onions, cabbage, carrots, garlic and 1/4 tsp salt and stir to mix. Stir occasionally and cool until vegetables are soft (6-8 min). Add in chicken, green onions, peanuts, cilantro, remaining salt and pepper, tossing to coat, cook for 1-2 min. Add 3/4 c coconut milk and 1/3 c sweet chili sauce, mixing thoroughly to combine. Turn off heat. 3. Spray 9×13 dish with nonstick spray. Whisk together remaining coconut milk and sweet chili sauce. Pour about 1/2 C on the bottom of the dish. Slightly warm tortillas, then place a few spoonfuls of the chicken mixture in each, roll up tightly and place in the dish. Use a spoon to cover the tortillas with remaining coconut milk and chili sauce mix. 4. Bake for 20 minutes, remove and garnish with peanuts and cilantro. Spoon sauce from the bottom of the dish all over the tortillas. The vegetables cooling and softening Previous Rolled up and ready to head into the oven Final product! Next

  • Studying Tips | Doc on the Run

    < Back Studying Tips Study Techniques Reading and re-reading textbooks/ notes. Pros- simple. Cons- passive. Easy to not absorb information as your eyes pass over the same text. Reading and highlighting textbooks/ notes. Pros- simple. More interactive than merely reading. Cons- similar to re-reading- still relatively passive. Risk of highlighting everything and not focusing on key points. Reading and handwriting notes in your own handwriting. Pros- active engagement in learning, reframe the information in your own style. You can color-code, reorganize, personalize it. Cons- takes more time. When to study There are two key circadian rhythm patterns. In his book When: The Scientific Secrets of Perfect Timing ," Daniel H Pink refers to these as "chronotypes." There are three chronotypes (larks, owls, and third birds), but the differences between them are largely inconsequential, so they are simplified to two different groups, classically known as early bird and night owl. If you haven't identified your chronotype, you can do a few relatively straightforward steps to determine your pattern. Identifying your chronotype will give you a framework to plan your peak time for analytical tasks, such as studying. If you have any control over your daily schedule, even if it's just weekends, take advantage of your inherent pattern to optimize your studying. Early morning studying before class/ clinical rotations might be optimal for some, while others are more conducive to evening learning. What has worked for me? I used to be a read and re-read type. I'm a fast reader, so it worked to get through high school and medical school. During surgery residency, I used iAnnotate PDF, which allows me to highlight and make notes. When I was entering fellowship, I renovated my style. First, I wrote notes for the handful of critical care texts that I read (Fink and Marino) and the trauma text (Mattox). During the summer before my ACS fellowship, I typed notes while reading Fink and Marino. I used iAnnotate PDF because it allows me to highlight and make notes. I did switch to a hard copy of Civetta because I needed a new format to re-ignite my focus. I used old fashioned lined paper and pencil and then rewrote them into a notebook. After I got burnt out on textbooks, I made the leap to reading journal articles. Switching to primary literature was a monumental change in my studying. I always marvel at attendings who can quote journal articles with ease. It always strikes me that their memory is so crisp...I've never had that gift. When I started reading articles, I developed a system for finding, reading, and then recording the salient findings. How I built my literature database for Acute Care Surgery There are several ways to find articles. Surgical Clinics (previously known as Surgical Clinics of North America) is one of my favorite journals for reviewing broad topics. Every article is evidence-based, with abundant references. The most current journals will be a treasure trove of high-yield references. The open journals and published guidelines (read: free!) are another excellent resource. The references in reviews and guidelines are the basis of evidence-based medicine. Read! You don't have to read every word, and as you read more articles, you will develop a sense of which papers can be perused and which deserve a more diligent review, such as landmark articles (see suggested articles). Highlight, make notes and ask yourself, "how will this change my practice". Previous Next

  • Austere Damage Control Surgery | Doc on the Run

    Caring for soldiers in the deployed environment Austere Damage Control Surgery < Back Caring for soldiers in the deployed environment “Our general attitude around here is that we want to play par surgery. Par is a live patient.” Several years ago, when I was preparing to apply for trauma fellowship, someone called me a meatball surgeon. I thought it was a lame nickname that meant our job was mindlessly easy. For the first time ever, I recently Googled meatball surgery. The term "meatball surgery" was used to describe the damage control interventions performed in MASH. Yes, I am proud to say I am a meatball surgeon for our soldiers. Telling me I save lives is a compliment…not an insult. Meatball Surgery Military surgeons are frequently deployed to far forward environments to perform damage control surgery- stopping bleeding, stopping gross spillage of bowel contents, stenting vascular injuries, etc. This allows the patient to be evacuated to the next level of care. The goal is NOT definitive repair of injuries. All general surgeons deploy in this role- so maintaining trauma operative skills and the skill of "thinking like a trauma surgeon" is crucial. This is being increasingly provided between deployments with skills labs and military civilian partnerships. There is still a significant gap between recommended case volume and actual case volume. Recently, the suggestion to train non-surgeons to do “just a bit of damage control surgery" in the deployed environment has been proposed in several forums, including on social media. Short version: “You can’t convince me that pelvic packing, laparotomy, vascular control, thoracotomies are difficult.” Why is this a problem? As mentioned, its hard enough to train our general surgeons well-trained to perform in this environment. It would take significant changes in our current training rhythm to get Pas and non-surgeons adequately proficient to provide this skillset. It is NOT easy being a trauma surgeon. A lot of surgery residents are familiar with the oft repeated quote, "you can teach a monkey to operate". It's not meant to insult trainees and compare them to monkeys. It's meant to explain that the difficult skill of being a surgeon is the judgment to decide who needs surgery, what surgery is needed and how to anticipate the next step. There are many algorithms in surgery. They are excellent guides to optimal patient care. But they all have the same caveat (although some might not state it as explicitly)- they are not to be used in isolation, but instead in the setting of sound clinical judgment. To gain this expertise, surgeons endure 4 years of undergraduate education, 4 years in medical school, 5-7 years of surgical residency, and 1-2 years of fellowship. And even after I spent all this time training, I’m still not done learning this art. If you say these are "not difficult” procedures, I encourage you to complete a general surgery followed by a trauma fellowship. The military actually does need more trained trauma surgeons. But no, I’m not interested in training a non-surgeon to do “just a little bit” of trauma surgery. I can't imagine any trauma surgeon who would be willing to teach a watered down version of our skill to a non-surgeon and sign off that they’re qualified to care for our soldiers. Please don't insult our expertise. I would never presume to be an expert in another persons specialty. This would be similar to suggesting that I can be easily trained to be special forces. Anyone can be taught to shoot a weapon, evade the enemy, decide the best tactical approach, etc. You may say that’s an exaggeration. But it’s the absolute truth. A field surgeon is NOT a surgeon. A brigade surgeon is NOT a surgeon. A flight surgeon is NOT a surgeon. A division surgeon is NOT a surgeon. A battalion surgeon is NOT a surgeon. The Surgeon General is NOT a surgeon. Previous Next

  • Vignette: Just Cellulitis...or something worse.... | Doc on the Run

    < Back Just Cellulitis...or something worse.... A 42-year-old female presents to the ED with one week of painful swelling of her left medial upper thigh. Her past medical history is remarkable for diabetes, morbid obesity, and rheumatoid arthritis, for which she takes immunomodulator therapy. She had been seen by a PCM earlier in the week and was started on antibiotics. She returned to her PCM when she continued to have pain and swelling and she was then sent to the ER for evaluation. She was concerned because the redness was extending to her groin and lower abdomen. On exam, she had redness and edema to her left lower abdominal wall extending midway down her thigh. Initial x-ray image What are the signs and symptoms suggestive of NSTI? Symptoms- fevers, painful skin lesion (redness, swelling, warmth) Signs- tachycardia, potentially hypotension. Skin warmth, edema, foul-smelling drainage, blistered or sloughing skin, crepitus. *Pain out of proportion to exam is a concerning finding. What workup should be performed? Labs- CBC, electrolytes, lactate Imaging- x-ray, ultrasound to rule out abscess, CT An ultrasound was performed, but it was non-diagnostic. There was no obvious underlying abscess. Why is ultrasound difficult with NSTI present? Soft tissue air obscures the ultrasound images. Evidence of artifact on the ultrasound can be suggestive of NSTI. What is the initial treatment of NSTI? Like any septic patient, antibiotics, resuscitation, and rapid source control are paramount. For necrotizing soft tissue infections, source control requires expeditious surgical exploration and debridement. Representative image from CT scan- upper thigh Representative image from CT scan- lower abdominal wall After starting broad-spectrum antibiotics and fluid resuscitation, the patient was taken to the operating room. Upon exploration, the tissue planes were easily dissected and there was copious grey-tinged malodorous fluid. The fluid was cultured to allow tailoring of antibiotic therapy. All necrotic tissue was excised and the wound was left open with gauze packing. She required low-dose norepinephrine during the case and had an elevated lactate. She remained intubated and was taken to the ICU. She returned each of the following 3 days until there was no more evidence of necrotic tissue or undrained infection. At that time a wound vac was placed and she returned for wound vac changes every 3 days. Management of Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection (NSTI) Risk factors- diabetes, immunosuppression, malnutrition, obesity, IV drug use. Bacteriology- often polymicrobial (Type 1), 20% are monomicrobial (Group A strep or S aureus). Culture with Gram + rods= Clostridia (Type III). Diagnosis [1] Patients may present with sepsis and multi-system organ failure. Physical Exam- erythema or discolored skin, edema, pain out of proportion to exam, bullae, crepitus (late finding). Fever, hypotension. Imaging- CT is more reliable than plain films. MRI is most effective but may delay care. Plain films- gas in soft tissues MRI- fascial thickening CT- soft tissue air, muscle edema, fluid collections, thickened non-enhancing fascia Labs- leukocytosis, elevated lactate. Blood cultures. LRINEC score- ≥6 is suspicious, ≥8 is strongly predictive. Low sensitivity, not reliable to rule-out NSTI.[1,2] CRP ≥150= 4 points WBC 15-25= 1 point, >25= 2 points Hgb 11-13.5= 1 point, <11= 2 points Sodium <135= 2 points Cr >1.4= 2 points Glucose >180= 1 point Intraoperative findings: dishwater-like fluid is frequently encountered. Tissue planes easily separate, including the soft tissue separating from the underlying fascia. Management Rapid resuscitation, antibiotics, and surgical excision. If there is a high clinical suspicion, don't delay surgery to await imaging. Obtain tissue culture intraoperatively. Antibiotics Broad-spectrum until cultures available- vanco OR linezolid + pip/tazo OR carbapenem OR ceftriaxone/metronidazole S aureus- nafcillin, cefazolin, vancomycin, clindamycin Group A strep OR Clostridium- clindamycin and penicillin. Adjuvant Therapies IV immunoglobulin- neutralize Strep or clostridia toxin. Hyperbarics- no clear benefit. Immunomodulators? There are comprehensive reviews of the current practices regarding diagnosis and treatment of NSTI in Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine.[3,4] References Fernando SM. Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection: Diagnostic Accuracy of Physical Examination, Imaging, and LRINEC Score: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Surg. 2019 Jan;269(1):58-65. Wong CH et al. The LRINEC (Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis) score: A tool for distinguishing necrotizing fasciitis from other soft tissue infections. Crit Care Med. 2004;32 (7):1535-1541. Hua C et al. Necrotising soft-tissue infections. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Mar;23(3):e81-e94. Stevens DL et al. Necrotizing Soft-Tissue Infections. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(23):2253-2265. Previous Next

  • Consults | Doc on the Run

    How to play nice in the sand box...and why it matters Consults < Back How to play nice in the sand box...and why it matters The department of Acute Care Surgery and Emergency Medicine frequently interact to discuss consults. Unfortunately, several factors predispose to an adversarial relationship between the ER provider and the consultant.(1) I won't pretend that I didn't contribute to some of the negative interactions I've had while responding to consults. However, I'm grateful that my years of experience have provided me with insight and perspective that reframed my thoughts about the consultation process. What are the different types of consults? #1 The patient requires something that is beyond the scope of practice of the emergency provider. This includes everything from hospital admission, surgical or procedural intervention (appendectomy, stop the bleeding from a penetrating neck wound, cardiac catheterization), or a plan for close follow-up. How to Respond? This is why we chose our specialty, and our business is patient care. If a consultant is not responsive, it might be because they are caring for more urgent clinical issues. It's also possible that they are a generally unpleasant person, and it has no relation to the nature of the consult..some people can be difficult regardless of the scenario. Admittedly, it might also be 2 am, and they just fell back asleep after their last page. As much as I hate to admit, it's harder to be pleasant on the phone when you're absolutely exhausted. #2 The unclear diagnosis. The patient is presenting with a complex issue, or the diagnosis may be outside the provider's experience. This could be the first time they encounter a particular clinical scenario or an unusual presentation of a common diagnosis. How to Respond? Depends on the scenario. If that patient requires emergent assistance, prioritize their needs. If no emergent need, but further workup is needed, provide whatever recommendations you can regarding the next steps of the diagnostic workup. If the patient's case falls under your specialty, refer back to #1. #3 The emergency room provider doesn't know who the appropriate consultant is, or they have had no luck reaching them. How to Respond? It's easy to brush off a call when the primary provider called the wrong service. This might occur if the provider cannot reach a particular specialist, and you are the next best option (example- plastic surgeon doesn't respond for a consult on a patient with a wound complication). Please, if you know how to reach that provider, lend a hand. Or, if they call the wrong service, take the time to give a little guidance about whom they should have called. They aren't trying to waste your time- they are likely also busy, and calling multiple consultants is not the best way to spend their time either. Whatever assistance you can provide is best for the patient. #4 The controversial consult. In my experience, during years of working with surgeons and emergency physicians, probably one of the most contentious consultations is the consultation for something that the consultant considers inappropriately simple or unnecessary. The surgeon may think that the issue is trivial or the need is non-existent and feel that the provider should be capable of resolving the issue without calling a surgeon. This disconnect might be the key patient interaction that can set the tone for the relationship between departments. How to Respond? First, and most importantly, please don't be dismissive when someone calls you for a consult. If you are receiving a call, it's because the person on the other end of the phone (and therefore the patient they are caring for) needs your help. Surgeons, along with other specialists, have extensive specific expertise, so it's easy to lose perspective and presume that the knowledge in our head is universal. It's become almost intuitive in our minds, so we might forget that the primary provider does NOT have the same specialization. We each chose our respective specialties, and our training and biases are quite divergent. It is unreasonable to expect ER physicians to share the same depth of knowledge in each of the many specialties, just as each of the specialists would not have the same ability to deftly juggle the wide array of clinical scenarios managed in the ER. I remember the plastic surgeon who showed me how to do a scar revision on a young woman's face. He spent his career training and practicing to perform plastic surgery. It was simple in his hands, but that doesn't mean the woman would have a similar outcome if the needle driver was in my hand. Please, think of the patient's best interest. Yes, the primary provider may be "an idiot" or "lazy" or whatever. But consider the other possibilities. I prefer to give my colleagues the benefit of the doubt and avoid automatically assuming incompetence. Regardless of the underlying issue, whether it's a flaw of the provider or its truly beyond their capability, the patient needs someone to take care of them. Do the right thing for the patient- in the end, that's what matters. 1. Koo A, Bothwell J. Tips for Working with Consultants. ACEP Now. Nov 2017. Previous Next

  • Colorectal Disease | Doc on the Run

    < Back Colorectal Disease UpToDate Patient Education Patient education: Diverticular disease (Beyond the Basics) . Also known as diverticulosis. If associated with an acute episode of infection, this is reference to as diverticulitis. Patient education: Constipation in adults (Beyond the Basics) Patient education: High-fiber diet (Beyond the Basics) Patient education: Colonoscopy (Beyond the Basics) Patient Information from Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Colonoscopy American College of Surgeons: Division of Education Colonoscopy Prep Form Golytely®, Colyte®, Nulytely®, Trilyte® Source: UpToDate Images: Colon and Rectum Patient Info- Constipation .pdf Download PDF • 54KB Previous Next

  • How Do I Do It? | Doc on the Run

    Practical Tips on Having a Difficult Discussion How Do I Do It? < Back Practical Tips on Having a Difficult Discussion This blog is complementary to the previous blog about becoming more comfortable with uncomfortable conversations. After many difficult discussions with families during my critical care fellowship, I finally became comfortable with uncomfortable conversations. It's impossible to develop a script to use for every conversation, but here are some of the techniques I've adopted over the years. Sit down in a private room, have tissues if appropriate. Make sure your phone/ pager won't interrupt the conversation. Have someone else with you. It’s always good to bring the patient's nurse, and there is often spiritual support staff (ie chaplains) who can accompany you and provide support for the family. Introduce yourself, and ask who everyone in the room is, specifically how they're related to the patient. "Nice to meet you, I'm really sorry it's under these circumstances." If it's your first conversation with the family, it's important to establish a foundation to build on (or establish the absence of a foundation). You can ask "what do you know so far" or "what's your current understanding of the situation"? This also allows them to express their current questions/ concerns. Judge their level of comprehension and adjust as needed. This does NOT mean being patronizing or imposing stereotypes. Pay attention to facial expressions and listen to their questions/ responses. It's easy to fall back into speaking medical jargon- you need to deliberately focus on using easily understandable words. Words that we use every day are meaningless to most people who aren't in the medical field. Keep the conversation brief and take frequent pauses. They don't hear everything you say, and they'll hear even less if you talk non-stop. Allow them time to process what you’ve shared, and allow them to ask any questions they have. Acknowledge that it’s common to be overwhelmed by the discussion. You can validate them by offering "I know I just told you a lot of information" or "I know this can all be overwhelming". It’s also helpful to say, “I’m sure you will think of other questions, please write them down so we can discuss them later” Encourage them to discuss things amongst themselves and provide them a quiet private place to regroup after the meeting. It’s also helpful to say, “I’m sure you will think of other questions, please write them down so we can discuss them later.” This validates their feeling and reassures them that they don't have to worry about remembering every detail. Specific difficult topics - Death and dying. Acknowledge that what they are feeling is normal- regardless of what they feel, it's normal. Denial, angry, scared, guilty, confused, conflicted, exhausted, numb. - When they are wrestling with the decision about transitioning to comfort care (colloquially known as "withdrawal of care", or crassly, "pulling the plug") and they've verbalized that they know it's what their family member would want, acknowledge how difficult that decision can be but also reaffirm that they are doing the kindest thing by honoring their family members wishes. For other helpful tips, check out "Sunburn". "For patients who are alive, concentrate on the ‘big picture’ and avoid the inclination to catalog every injury during this initial encounter. The primary concern in these settings often consists of survival, brain damage, paralyzation and other major morbidities. Again, an overabundance of information can be overwhelming." Velez D et al. SUNBURN: a protocol for delivering bad news in trauma and acute care surgery. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2022 Feb 9;7(1):e000851. Previous Next

  • Book Review: Range | Doc on the Run

    2 Range Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized World - Early expertise and overspecialization do not equate to success. Having a breadth of knowledge is key to solving issues that cross different disciplines. - An extensive explanation of the benefit of the breadth of knowledge and the risks of super sub-specialization. Loss of cross-communication between silos of isolated components. - Wicked problems- issues that require outside-the-box thinking, can't be solved by relying on specialization but needs interaction between various contexts. - Capitalize on the varied backgrounds when trying to solve a problem. Gathering 10 specialists who all share the same knowledge and experience to focus on one issue can easily lead to a dead-end- without the benefit of new and fresh ideas, the team ends up in a loop. Diversity can exponentially increase problem-solving by drawing from different perspectives, viewpoints, and thought processes. - Contrasts to the 10,000-hour rule, which asserts the benefits of focused training and specialization. Previous Next

  • What is ACS? A Day in the Life of an Acute Care Surgeon | Doc on the Run

    < Back A Day in the Life of an Acute Care Surgeon This is a general outline of the daily routine of an Acute Care Surgeon- it does not represent a universal experience, because every facility and every team is unique. Daily schedules vary between the different services. Some facilities have a small enough volume that all three aspects are covered by one surgeon. However, for busy facilities, there can be up to 5-6 surgeons covering the different services. There can be multiple ICU teams to manage, each requiring a surgeon. In-coming trauma might require the full attention of one surgeon, while another surgeon takes care of inpatients and scheduled cases. This is not a guide for how to set up a department- it's just a peek into what we do during the day. The day typically starts with morning report, where overnight events are discussed. This can include trauma and ICU admissions, as well as operative cases. Other significant events such as patients who required transfer to a higher level of care are also discussed. Following morning report, the different services diverge to meet with their teams, either in the OR, in the ICU, or on the inpatient wards. Trauma Service Rounds [the process of evaluating and examining patients currently in the hospital] - Residents typically see the patients first, review their blood work and their x-rays, examine them and ask them pertinent questions to report to their chief resident/ attending. The attending and the chief resident/ senior resident discuss the patients and visit patients in person. There are different practice patterns, and flexibility is required. If the same team is also covering new trauma consults from the emergency department (ED), rounds might be staggered or split based on staffing and patient volume. - Patient evaluation focuses on monitoring patients in the postoperative period, including assessment of bowel function (have you passed gas or had a bowel movement?), nutrition and oral intake (hungry, eating 1/2 of meals, nauseated), pulmonary function (performing breathing exercises), pain control, activity (working with physical therapy, walking laps, breathing exercises), examining wounds, and ruling out surgical complications. Care for patients recovering from trauma also entails communication with subspecialists, such as orthopedics or neurosurgery. Procedures - Emergent operations on new admissions- exploratory laparotomy for intra-abdominal injuries (bowel injury, severe bleeding), thoracotomy for intra-thoracic injuries (severe bleeding, wound to the heart), repair of vascular injuries (bleeding from a blood vessel). - Scheduled operations for patients on the trauma service. Consultations and New Admissions - The majority of patient consults for trauma originate in the ED. Rarely, a patient who is currently admitted to the hospital may be diagnosed with an occult injury (meaning it wasn't found on initial assessment) or a patient may sustain an injury while in the hospital. Surgical Critical Care Rounds - See “What happens during Surgical Critical Care (SICU) Rounds? for details. Procedures - Tracheostomy- creation of a connection directly through the neck to the trachea (airway) to allow removal of the endotracheal tube (breathing tube) from the mouth. - Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube (PEG)- creation of a connection directly through the anterior abdominal wall into the stomach to allow feeding without requiring a tube in the patient’s nose. - Bronchoscopy- use of a small camera (think of a really skinny colonoscopy) to examine the airways of the lungs, take a specimen for culture or remove obstruction. - Central line placement- placement of a large catheter into a large vein in the neck, under the clavicle (collarbone), or in the groin. The purpose is similar to an IV (intravenous) line, which is commonly placed to provide medication, fluids, or draw blood. A central line is larger- more drips can be connected to it, it can be kept in place longer than a peripheral IV, and it can allow delivery of special medications. - Arterial line placement- similar to an IV, this is a skinny catheter, but instead of being in a vein, it’s placed in an artery. This allows continuous monitoring of blood pressure and allows repeat labs, specifically arterial blood gas to assess respiratory status Consultations and New Admissions - Scheduled or semi-scheduled surgical cases such as complex vascular procedures (aortic surgery, carotid surgery), transplant surgery (patients receive a new liver or kidney), resection of head and neck cancer with a need for management of tracheostomy, and monitoring of muscle flap. - Emergent surgical cases such as a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (thinning of the wall with eventual rupture with bleeding), bowel perforation (hole in the intestine), or any of a variety of surgical catastrophes. - Severely injured trauma patients, including patients who require close monitoring of hemodynamics (low blood pressure, high heart rate) or pulmonary status (ability to take deep breaths with severe trauma to the chest), or patients with head injuries requiring intubation. - Non-ICU patients in lower acuity units that require ICU admission for deterioration in clinical status (respiratory distress, altered mental status, hemodynamic instability). Emergency General Surgery Rounds - Similar to trauma patients as above. For patients who haven’t had surgery (uncomplicated diverticulitis or small bowel obstructions secondary to adhesive disease), close monitoring for changes in clinical status is vital. Procedures - Emergent operations on new admissions- laparotomy for bowel ischemia/ perforation (decreased blood flow to the bowel or a hole in the bowel). - Scheduled operations for patients on the emergency general surgery service, for example, reversal of an ostomy. Patients who undergo emergent surgery for trauma or bowel ischemia/ perforation sometimes require creation of an opening on the skin to allow stool to pass outside into a bag. These can be “reversed”, meaning the bowel is reconnected (so the patient will now pass stool normally) and the skin opening is closed. Consultations and New Admissions - Patient consults typically originate in the ED. Everything from abdominal pain to rectal pain to massive intestinal bleeding can prompt a phone call/ page/ text message to the Emergency General Surgery service. - Patients admitted for non-surgical diseases can develop a surgical emergency during their hospital admission. This includes diagnoses that typically prompt a visit to the ED (appendicitis, cholecystitis), but there are a host of other diagnoses that are more frequent in the hospital setting, such as C. difficle colitis. In addition to daily responsibilities, there are weekly or monthly department-wide events. - Staff Meetings - Trauma Morbidity and Mortality- discuss outcomes from trauma cases. - General Surgery Morbidity and Mortality- discuss outcomes from general surgery cases. - Grand Rounds- lectures from subject matter experts on various surgical topics. Previous Next

  • It's a Small World | Doc on the Run

    And You Really Should be Nice to People It's a Small World < Back And You Really Should be Nice to People The medical community is incredibly small and interconnected. This can be very beneficial, but can also create challenges if interpersonal discord arises. Word travels fast and it's easy to burn bridges. In the medical field, there is a palpable tension between certain specialties. Not every hospital has the same procedure for managing trauma. However, in the countless hospitals I've worked in, clinicians in Emergency Medicine and Trauma Surgery work hand in hand to manage severely injured trauma patients. We have different training experiences and different management styles. When we (Trauma Surgery) come down to the trauma bay to evaluate a patient, we are a visitor. Yes, in a busy hospital, we might be incredibly frequent visitors. But still, we are guests in another department's home. Despite the best intentions, and perhaps even because of varying perspectives on what is "the best" intention, it is not a surprise that the trauma bay can serve as a breeding ground for animosity,(1) unless there are deliberate efforts to prevent conflict. Thankfully, creating a common language and developing standard practices is possible through mutually developed protocols, as well as principles in ATLS. This is crucial to effective patient care. I am grateful that I completed my Acute Care Surgery fellowship at a hospital system with a phenomenal relationship with our Emergency Department colleagues. I won't exaggerate and deny any conflicts, but there was a culture of mutual respect and a common goal of optimal patient care that I had never experienced before. Why Does It Matter? I started this post to share a story of why it's important to be nice to everyone you encounter. I mean, besides the fact that I believe that we should be kind and compassionate to everyone. At one facility that I worked, there was a less than friendly relationship between surgery and the emergency department. Again, I will confess that I likely had several of my own negative interactions. However, my general principle is based on what I described above. I consider my behavior and attitude to be at least a basic level of respect and decency to the providers that I interacted with. In contrast to unpleasant providers, I appeared to be above average. About 5 years ago, I was preparing for a deployment. I had the misfortune of being attacked by several dogs and required a series of rabies vaccines, which delayed my medical clearance. Thankfully, one of the ER providers from my hospital was at pre-deployment with me. He called a senior medical officer and obtained clearance so I could proceed without delay. It would have been easy for me to dismiss this provider during any of our countless interactions. If I had been consistently less pleasant, I suspect that he would have maintained a basic level of decency despite my poor behavior. But it's unlikely that he would have extended himself to advocate on my behalf. You never know what interaction could make the difference, so we should be nice to everyone. 1. Why Can't Emergency Medicine and Surgery Just Get Along? EmCrit Podcast. Previous Next

  • Vignette: Nutrition...pending | Doc on the Run

    < Back Nutrition...pending Nutrition Previous Next

  • Book Review: Freakanomics | Doc on the Run

    8 Freakanomics A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything - Hard to include all the different topics under one umbrella. Very controversial topics, such as crime, cheating, the impact of a name. - Correlation versus causation. Does legalized abortion lead to decreased crime? Using broad generalizations, people who grow up with mothers who didn't want them are placed in circumstances that increased their likelihood of involvement in crime. Previous Next

Sign up to hear about new educational content and editorials!

bottom of page