< Back Sausage Tortellini and Brussels Sprouts Ingredients Sausage Tortellini 2 Tbsp olive oil 2 lbs sausage 2 cloves garlic, minced 1 c vegetable broth 2 c tomato sauce ½ c heavy cream 18 oz tortellini Salt & pepper Brussels Sprouts One package of Brussels Sprouts olive oil black pepper sea salt balsamic vinegar Instructions Sausage Tortellini Heat oil in a large skillet and cook sausage links about 5-7 minutes, until sausages are browned throughout. Add garlic and heat for 30 seconds. Remove sausages from skillet and slice into bite-size pieces. Return sausages to pan along with broth, tomato sauce, cream, and tortellini. Season with salt & pepper. Cover and simmer for 12 minutes. Brussels Sprouts Prepare sprouts by trimming the base and then cutting the sprouts in half or quarters, and then place them in a medium-sized bowl. Drizzle a small amount of olive oil and balsalmic vinegar, and then sprinkle black pepper and sea salt. Toss to coat the sprouts, let sit for at least 30 min. Roast at 400 for 20-30 min, toss halfway through. Sausages cooking Previous Tortellini in Sauce Brussels Sprouts Next

How to be a Terrible First Date Dating, Pt 2 How to be a Terrible First Date Recently, I was set up on a blind date. He seemed like a normal mature guy via text. Polite, intelligent responses, etc. We agreed to meet at a local bakery. My first clue should have been the fact that he didn't have the fortitude to message me first. I don't do a great job of taking my own advice…I had told myself I wouldn't message first, that he would have to be the guy and reach out first. Oops. When I showed up, he was sitting outside. I sat down and he asked if I wanted to order something. He told me they have great food and good coffee, to which I replied that I don't drink coffee. And the date careened downhill from there. His response? Not drinking coffee is a red flag that a woman isn't a good partner. Goes along with not liking chocolate. He declared that if something else goes wrong later in the relationship, you can look back and say yeah they told me there was something wrong from the beginning. Then he went off on a tangent about how people who don't eat the same kind of foods won't be compatible in relationships. For example a vegetarian and a vegan. More specifically, a really douchey vegetarian or vegan. I didn't know people still used that word…actually, I didn't know that it was ever used out loud as an adjective by a guy. He continued with other crazy comparisons. Like Jewish people who don't eat pork. Or cannibals. Or carnivores. Told me a story about having a friend who ate dogs. Some context for the dog-eating conversation-- there was an adorable medium-sized fluffy black and white dog sitting about 3 feet away from us. He and his owner are clearly within earshot. He continued…."do you see that dog right there, she (his friend from Asia) would think it would be OK to eat a dog." I didn't know what to say to that. All I could say at that point was that I could never eat that dog, that I couldn't even kill a dog! His monologue about eating continued with an explanation of why humans are the superior beings on the planet. The bottom line was that the thing that makes us the superior being is the fact that we can eat any other animal. It's not our intelligence (dolphins are more intelligent), it's not our technology, we aren't faster or braver. But we can eat any animal. And somehow he related this to the use of smartphones- using a smartphone doesn't make you smart. A stupid person can use a smartphone but still eat any animal. He then delved further into the world of food and eating with a rant about McDonald's. You’ve heard of McDonald's, right? Are you too good to eat at McDonald's? Have you heard of Jim Gaffigan? He does a skit about McDonald's. You ever run into someone at a McDonalds’s and they ask what you’re doing there...you just pretend you’re meeting a hooker. Him: McDonald’s fries are the best thing. Me: not if they’re cold. Him: Well you have to eat them within 5 minutes. After those five minutes, they’re no longer food. Me: But they aren’t always warm when you get them. Him: Then that’s your fault. If you don’t check and you drive away, it’s on you. You can’t blame anyone else. Me: But who wants to be the person who holds up the line in the drive-thru? Him: You have to be coordinated, pay, and inspect the fries all at the same time. And if they’re cold, you hand them back and say these are cold I need new fries. And everyone in that line behind you will understand that. If you drive away and the fries are cold, it's your fault. I tried to change the subject by commenting on the restaurant. Told him there was a place I previously lived that had similar food, but the décor on the inside was quirky. It was awesome because it was open 24/7. His response…there weren't other places open 24/7? IHOP? I asserted that there were not many places….maybe Huddle House. He said he's never been to a Huddle House. I said it's like a worse version of Waffle House. He said, have you ever been to a Waffle House? It's like a truck stop bathroom with a kitchen. I told him, yes, and that Huddle House must be an East Coast thing. He told me they don't have it up north, so I said Ok, maybe it’s a North Carolina thing. Why does everything have to be a disagreement??? Finally, after complaining about not wanting to give up the table he picked, he agreed that we should go in and order food. When we were in line to order, the conversation took on a slightly different tone. He proceeds to lecture me on the fact that making requests or asking questions regarding food at a restaurant is a personality flaw. He also told me that you need to try everything at least twice. Without even knowing me, he was insulting people who make requests at a restaurant. He made some mention of bacon, and I said I don't care for bacon, and asked whether not liking bacon is as bad as not liking coffee or chocolate? He said that's not a big deal in Texas, maybe in North Carolina or Georgia it would be (the last two places I've lived…again, he knows nothing about me). When I asked why I have to try something else two more times when I already know what I like (or don't like), he said, what if you get to be 80 years old, and your tastes have changed? He told me, just go with the flow….he said if he orders beans and they give him rice instead, he'll just eat the rice. Me: But what if you really want beans. Him: Just go with it, order the beans next time. Some people eat dirt and mud. Me: Just because there are people who have to eat dirt doesn't mean we just have to eat whatever is given to us. Him: Don't ask a lot of questions to someone who barely has a high school education. So basically…he doesn't have a spine to ask for what he wants when he eats out. Probably translates into other areas of his life where he isn't able to stand up for himself…just a guess. So now that he's already insulting people who have preferences about food, I had to tell him about a recent outing with work colleagues. We went to an outdoor American food place, and I wanted a plain burger. The only thing they had on the menu was a burger with brisket on top. So I asked my friends if that meant brisket sauce or actual brisket meat. Immediately, my date tells me I asked too many questions. I tried to play along, acquiescing that barbeque is a big deal in Texas. But then, I said I don't eat that much food at one time and I didn't want more meat on my burger. He told me not to complain, and just eat half and give it to a homeless person. He told a story about giving food to a homeless person once in Austin…the homeless person asked if it was gluten-free, and then when he said I'm not sure, and the homeless person said, ok, never mind. So a weird humble brag, talking bad about a homeless person while simultaneously telling me he is a generous person. So again, it was my turn to tell a story about myself to see how he'd insult me some more. Me: I went to a restaurant that I really liked back home and I like the green beans there. I went there one time and they didn't have green beans. Him: You can be sad about that but don't be whiny about it. The restaurant was relatively crowded, kinda looked more like a Saturday morning than a Thursday morning. He did that awkward thing where he says rude things out loud so everyone around us can hear him being insulting. Him: Why are there so many people here? It's a Thursday morning. These people should be at their jobs. Me: You do realize we are here, right? The menu advertised a breakfast sandwich…which I guess I was going to order but had to make sure not to ask questions or tell them what I want. In an attempt to make a sarcastic joke, he asked about whether the sandwich was gluten-free. And if the chickens were free-range. I made a joke and asked if the chickens were treated well and whether they were mocked as children. When we got back outside, he complains about the fact that the table he had been sitting at was taken. Then he walks around and complains that the rest of the tables are equally bad. Not so easy going now, eh?? We sat outside, and as we were waiting for our food, several birds were dive-bombing me, to which I responded like a normal person and ducked. He proceeded to chastise me for not standing up to the bird and not asserting my dominance. He told me it didn't bode well for my offspring that I couldn't stand up to a bird. Stated I would just let my children be pecked to death by birds. Said I'd be helpless, and hopeless for the rest of my life. Literally used those words. Not even implied, straight out said I was hopeless and helpless. Somehow we got on the conversation of working, basically said he only does his job to make money. I asked him if he enjoyed it or enjoyed helping people, and he said being a neurologist was the best he could come up with using the advantages he was born with. He said there was nothing better he could do to make money, to which I replied that he was choosing to limit himself. While we waited, he decided to give me a lesson on animals and nature. On nature shows, the lion is shown as the majestic king of the jungle, but they hide the fact that lions will eat their young. This part was much funnier in person because his tone of voice and storyline was so ridiculous. Like he was actually offended or thought it was a conspiracy that this wasn't shown on TV. He also gave a long monologue about how big birds eat other birds. Like helpless penguins. Birds try to eat their eggs. Sometimes the big bird will be looking down and the other bird knows it's about to get eaten. Other times, the other bird doesn't even know. It'll just be sitting there one moment, and the next moment, hey I'm being eaten. When I turned and spoke to one of the many dive-bombing birds, he proceeded to correct me about calling a bird the wrong gender. He stated that men are the brighter of the bird species because they have to attract the female bird. Told me about watching a show that talked about males of different species trying to attract females. Like fish get the rocks all together to show the girl fish that they can make a nice place, and then the girl fish comes over, so the male fish does a dance, and then if they get turned down by a female, they clean up the rocks and try again. Birds try to make the best nest to impress female birds. Then he told me that males are brighter than females, across all species. To which I disagreed, stating that I don't think men are more colorful than women. He corrected me, saying that’s why men wear ties…. Again, I told him I'm pretty sure females are more colorful. And he said, yea, women just like to shop. He also told me he could tell which was a female bird because they were the ones that ate everything. Yes, he said those words. Out loud. To a woman he'd never met. Throughout the date, he spent 97% of the date not talking about me or asking about me. I did proceed to tell him about the time I was attacked by dogs. And I told him it changed my life. He responded by asking (at least twice) what I did to the dogs to make them attack me. Seriously. Told him my story about the dogs. After I finished, he asked if I was bleeding. I recounted my story of going to the ER…to which he responded with…nothing. No sympathy. No nothing. Told him the rabies shot is really painful because they had to put it in my ankle. He said they probably did it wrong and it was his goal in life to never need a rabies shot. I then told him about how it changed the nature of my deployment…again, no questions about me. I told him it was odd to talk about birds eating each other on a first date. And I didn't know how he planned to get second dates after that conversation. He said he had watched a documentary with his niece and it was something he learned. Then he asked me what I learned. And then just stopped talking and went back to eating. Didn't even eat half my breakfast…so uncomfortable, and I wondered if he would tease me for eating all my food. By the way, he also sat with his feet on the chair next to me, legs straight. Back when we were in line ordering breakfast, I asked if he was cold, cause he had long pants, a sweater, and a long black wool coat. He said, no, he wore that so he wasn't cold… During breakfast, he told me because I had my arms folded that I was either cold or standoffish. Said that a few times over and over to me…and he even mocked me by folding his arms tightly across his chest and scowling. I then laid my hands on the table in front of me. He continued to mock me. Later, he noticed goosebumps and told me I was cold. And then told me because I wasn't furry (or hairy, I don't remember), goosebumps mean I'm cold. Later on, we took a walk along the river walk. It was mostly painfully awkward silence. But a few times, he did that weird thing talking out loud saying awkward things that other people can hear… There was a lady behind us with a stroller. He said, "I feel like we're being followed". Later, a yappy little dog barked at us, to which he said "no kill, no kill". The only interesting thing he talked about was racing cars. He mostly mumbled quietly, but I encouraged him to speak up and finally learned something interesting about him. He races cars- most recently a Ferrari, and he just bought a Lotus that he is getting ready for racing. He also used to race a Honda Accord. Reminds me of an ex-boyfriend who drove a Ford Taurus, but was convinced that just because he could hit the gas pedal hard, he was a race car driver… And then, just like that, mercifully, the torture was over. He walked us back to his car, pointed it out, and then walked away. Didn't ask where I parked or offer to walk me back. Again, all the little things can be written off as one-offs. Ok, fine, he didn't walk me to my car. Fine, he put his feet on the chair next to me. Yadda yadda yadda. But all together within like an hour? Come Previous Next

< Back Thai Chicken Enchiladas Ingredients 8 flour tortillas 2 cooked and shredded chicken breasts 1 Tbsp canola oil 1/2 sweet onion, chopped 1/3 C chopped/shredded carrots 1/2 C chopped/shredded cabbage (premade coleslaw mix works well) 4 garlic cloves, minced 1/2 tsp salt 1/2 tsp pepper 4 green onions, sliced 1/3 C chopped peanuts (more for garnish) 1/4 C chopped fresh cilantro (more for garnish) 2 1/2 C light coconut milk 1/3 C + 1/2 C sweet chili sauce Instructions 1. Preheat oven to 350 degrees F. 2. Heat oil in large skillet over medium heat. Add onions, cabbage, carrots, garlic and 1/4 tsp salt and stir to mix. Stir occasionally and cool until vegetables are soft (6-8 min). Add in chicken, green onions, peanuts, cilantro, remaining salt and pepper, tossing to coat, cook for 1-2 min. Add 3/4 c coconut milk and 1/3 c sweet chili sauce, mixing thoroughly to combine. Turn off heat. 3. Spray 9×13 dish with nonstick spray. Whisk together remaining coconut milk and sweet chili sauce. Pour about 1/2 C on the bottom of the dish. Slightly warm tortillas, then place a few spoonfuls of the chicken mixture in each, roll up tightly and place in the dish. Use a spoon to cover the tortillas with remaining coconut milk and chili sauce mix. 4. Bake for 20 minutes, remove and garnish with peanuts and cilantro. Spoon sauce from the bottom of the dish all over the tortillas. The vegetables cooling and softening Previous Rolled up and ready to head into the oven Final product! Next

< Back Bowel Anastomosis A handsewn small bowel anastomosis can be created end to end or side to side. When creating a side to side anastomosis, the planned enterotomy site on each limb of bowel is identified. The backwall is created first, just lateral to the planned enterotomy sites- it would be very challenging to access this portion of the anastomosis after creating the inner layer. The back layer is followed by inner layers of absorbable suture. My personal preference is Vicryl, but PDS can also be used. Finally, the anterior outer seromuscular layer of silk is created. Posterior outer layer of interrupted 3-0 Silk Limbert sutures Posterior inner layer of interrupted 3-0 Vicryl sutures Anterior inner layer of Connell with 3-0 Vicryl Anterior outer layer or interrupted 3-0 Silk Limbert sutures Inner layer of absorbable sutures and outer seromuscular layer of silk. Two different depictions of side to side anastomoses (1,2). Rao SD. Small Intestine, In: Snapshots in Gastroenterology. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. 2016. Rao SD. Pre- and Postoperative Management in Midgut (Small Bowel) Surgery, In: Gastrointestinal Surgery Step by Step Management. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. 2005. Previous Next

Things I don't want to do (or do again) Anti-Bucket List Things I don't want to do (or do again) Experiences I don't care to repeat, but glad I did them once Tough Mudder Eaten alligator and shark Things others want to do that I have no desire to do Skydiving Scuba diving Attend the Masters Previous Next

Surgery trainee education. Trauma surgeon. Acute Care Surgery. FAQs Why did you make this website? Over these years of learning about the practice of surgery, I've also learned a lot about myself. I am not an expert, and I did not follow a typical pathway- but I have some knowledge and resources to share. As I transition into my new Acute Care Surgeon role after 17 years in training, I'm pausing to share my experience, tips for success, and random nuggets of wisdom. This will be a work in progress, and I look forward to seeing how it evolves. My goal is to share my experience and knowledge in the hopes of helping those who desire to follow this path. But why do we need another medical education website? There are so many good resources already... There are endless ways to explain clinical concepts- pictures, text, analogies, clinical cases, podcast discussions of cases or principles, review articles, etc. There are also different learning styles. When I was trying to grasp advanced ventilator management, I read basic critical care textbooks, a book dedicated solely to ventilator management, and various websites and journal articles. This website is another way to interact with the information. Hopefully you will understand some of the concepts in a new way that helps you remember and apply them in clinical scenarios. In addition, I have also tried to create a comprehensive collection of all the useful resources I know, like apps and open access medical education resources (websites, clinical guidelines, etc) in one place for trainees to What does Doc on the Run mean? The summer before my last year of medical school was the start of my running career. My focus was enjoying the outdoors, not pace or distance. During my residency, I met someone who helped me refine my running. I started timing myself, training, and racing. Within a year or two, I pushed through personal barriers to become a "runner." My first half marathon was on Thanksgiving in my third year of surgical residency. I am at the end of my formal training, I am now an Acute Care Surgeon. As a surgeon, there are numerous factors that I can't control. It's fast-paced, demanding, and dynamic. I enjoy the organized chaos and high-stakes cases. Running is key to my work-life balance. Unlike in the operating room or the trauma bay, I have control over most aspects of my runs- pace, distance, route, and thoughts. It's not chaotic- it's basically the polar opposite of my work. During the day, my mind is going a million miles an hour. When I run, everything becomes clearer- I can solve problems, mull over ideas, or process dilemmas. And perhaps the most concrete impact is the runner's high that I enjoy after finishing. I have continued to run 10Ks, 10 milers, and the occasional 5K or 15K. I have learned more about the science of running (HR training zones, different paces for tempo/ interval/ long runs/ short runs) and I've learned how to adapt training schedules to fit my life. Unfortunately, I have suffered my share of injuries, including most recently nerve impingement in my foot. While I may have scaled back, running will always be part of my identity. Did you really build this website yourself? Yes, I did. No, I didn't do all the intricate coding by myself. But I did design, format, and create the content. So are you a computer/ technology guru? Whatever I know about technology, I learned from my brother and from spending many hours researching problems online. While my parents might consider me an expert, I literally just search online to solve most issues. When I get to the end of the internet and still haven't found the solution, my next step is Apple tech support (obviously only if the problem is with my iPhone or Mac). What did you learn while making this website? - Formatting the working space on a website - URL redirect - Domains and subdomains - Search engine optimization (SEO) - Establishing custom domains - Which text/ background colors are easiest to read - Anchors If you weren't an Acute Care Surgeon, what would you do? I'd be a chef. I love cooking! Is there anything that is overwhelmingly gross in your job? I have had almost every body fluid on me- stool, urine, blood, etc. So very little grosses me out. But I can't stand oral or nasal secretions (aka saliva, slobber, snot, etc.).

< Back Shakshuka- A North African Dish Ingredients 1 large red bell pepper, thinly sliced 1 large yellow bell pepper, sliced 1 red onion, sliced 3-4 garlic cloves, diced ¾ tsp salt cracked pepper to taste 1 tsp cumin 1 tsp sugar ½ tsp smoked paprika ½ tsp chili flakes 3 medium tomatoes diced small ⅓ c white wine or water 1 T fresh basil ribbons or chopped Italian parsley 4 -6 Extra large organic eggs Other optional additions: crumbled feta or goat cheese 1 C browned chorizo ¼ C finely diced spanish style cured Chorizo or Merguez, a North African spiced sausage Instructions 1. Preheat oven to 400F. 2. In a large cast iron skillet, heat the olive oil over medium heat. Add the onion and cook until tender, about 5 minutes. If adding raw chorizo, brown it with the onions. 3. Add the sliced peppers and garlic, and turn heat down to med-low and cook for 5 more minutes, until peppers are tender. If adding the cured spanish chorizo or Merguez sausage, add it now. Add all spices, sugar and salt. Cook for 2 more minutes. Add fresh tomatoes and white wine. 4. Simmer on low for 15 minutes, adding more water if it gets too dry or thick- you want a stew-like consistency. After tomatoes cook down, taste, it should be full flavored- adjust salt and sugar if necessary. Crack 4-6 eggs over the mixture, sprinkling each egg with salt and cracked pepper. Add crumble goat cheese or feta over the top and place in the 400F oven. 5. Bake until egg whites are cooked (about 7 minutes) and yolks are still soft. Remove from oven and top with fresh basil (or Italian parsley). Serve with toast or crusty bread. Veggies sizzling Previous Ready for the oven Yummy! Next

< Back Interpreting Chest X-Rays Developing skill with radiographic interpretation requires practice. Look at every film for your patients. Practice by looking at normal films, then compare between normal and abnormal. For example, compare an image for a patient with a normal cardiac silhouette and compare it with a patient with an abnormal silhouette with a widened mediastinum. This is NOT an exhaustive list of everything that can be seen on a chest x-ray, but is an overview of common pathology that can be seen. How to read a film 1. Identify- correct patient/ date/ time. 2. Identify orientation. Is the projection posterior-anterior (PA) or anterior-posterior (AP)? Is the patient rotated? PA is when the patient stands with their chest facing the x-ray cassette and the x-ray is behind the patient, so the x-ray beam travels from the posterior of the patient toward the plate, which is situated on the patients anterior surface. AP is when the patient’s back is towards the board and the x-ray is in from front of the patient, so the x-ray beam travels from the anterior of the patient toward the plate, which is situated on the patient’s posterior. This is the orientation when a patient is laying supine in the trauma bay. On an AP film, the heart appears enlarged compared to the PA. Rotated- compare bilateral or midline structures, such as clavicles and the spinous processes of the vertebra. If the clavicles are asymmetric or the spinous processes are not midline, the patient is rotated. Structures (ABCs) 1. Airway Is the trachea midline? Are there any opacities in the lung fields- pneumonia, masses, bilateral haziness? Do the lung markings extend to the edge of the chest? If not, and the space area is dark, this is suggestive of a pneumothorax. In contrast, if the space is white, this is suggestive of a fluid collection (hemothorax, infected fluid, etc). Is there evidence of fluid? This depends on the patient’s postion and the consistency of the fluid. Free fluid (fresh hemothorax, pleural effusion) will layer dependently, so if the patient is upright, the costophrenic angles will be blunted. If the patient is supine, the fluid can cause generalized opacity of the lung field because it layers along the back of the patient. 2. Bones- examine for fracture, dislocation, masses (tumor) Upper extremity/ shoulder? Ribs? Vertebra? 3. Cardiac Silhouette size/ contour? Normal is <1/2 the size of the thoracic cavity Evidence of aortic injury? *Bonus- 3 places for blunt aortic injury- aortic root, diaphragm, and isthmus just past subclavian takeoff Widened mediastinum (supine >8 cm or upright > 6cm) Loss of aortopulmonary window Abnormal aortic contour Depressed left mainstem bronchus Left apical capping Left hemothorax Nasogastric tube deviation Widened paraspinal or paratracheal stripe 4. Diaphragm Elevated- symmetric elevation is consistent with poor inspiratory volume. Blunting of costophrenic angle- effusion. Abdominal contents in chest (ie gastric bubble in the left chest)- consistent with diaphragm injury or defect. 5. Everything else Air in soft tissue- many potential etiologies, but common causes include pneumothorax or esophageal/ airway disruption. Air under the diaphragm (pneumoperitoneum)- concerning for hollow viscus injury. Iatrogenic foreign bodies- endotracheal tube, central lines, ports, pacemaker, endovascular grafts, esophageal stents, feeding tubes Non-iatrogenic foreign bodies- swallowed objects Additional References and Images from Radiopaedia.org **Click on Cases and figures and Imaging differential diagnosis on the right-hand column of each page for more in-depth explanations of specific pathology** Radiopaedia Airway Bones and Soft Tissue Cardiac Silhouette and Mediastinum Widened Mediastinum Hemothorax Pneumothorax Nasogastric Tube Position Previous Next

< Back Snowboarding Gear and Resources I currently ride a true twin snowboard. Brand- Arbor Cadence Size- 147 cm Profile- System Rocker What kind of board I'm looking for? All-mountain Shape- directional twin Profile- rocker/ reverse camber Flexibility- medium Website Links On the Snow Up-to-date information about snow conditions. Projected resort opening/ closing dates. State Level Information- V irginia Snow Report Specific Resort Information- Jay Peak Apps On the Snow (see above) Epic Pass Slopes How to Choose a Snowboard Snowboardingdays.com REI.com How to Set Up Your Snowboard Burton.com Mounting Burton Bindings Miscellaneous Seven Most Dog-Friendly Ski Resorts in North America Previous Next

< Back Vent Mgmt #4: All Together Choosing a mode Controlled- patients who aren't generating breaths. PC, VC. Most common mode at initiation of MV. SIMV- patient generating some breaths, but still needs significant mechanical support. Spontaneous- not frequently used at initiation, but can be used for patients with airway obstruction and preserved lung function. How to set initial parameters TV (6-8 mL/ kg predicted body weight) [lung protective ventilation] RR 10-14 FiO2 often start at 100%, but quickly weaned unless severely hypoxic Inspiratory:expiratory ratio typically 1:2 Flow- typically set @ 60L/min, can increase if the patient is in distress or has a high minute ventilation How to adjust parameters based on arterial blood gas results Low PaO2 (low arterial oxygen content)- increase FiO2, increase mean airway pressure Markedly elevated PaO2 (hyperoxia)- decrease FiO2 Low PaCO2 (low arterial carbon dioxide concentration)- decrease TV or RR High PaCO2 (high arterial carbon dioxide concentration)- increase TV or RR *For more details, check out these resources: Lectures: Critical Care: Respiratory Failure Lectures: Critical Care: Vents Other principles of mechanical ventilation VAP bundle- elevated head of bed, oral care Daily awakening and spontaneous breathing trials Previous Next

< Back Vent Mgmt #2: Modes Mandatory Breaths Volume control (volume limited)- set TV and flow, pressure and inspiratory time are the dependent variables. Pressure control (pressure limited)- set inspiratory pressure and inspiratory time, volume and flow are the dependent variables. What is the downside of VC and PC? You can only control one parameter, and the dependent variable varies based on the patient's lung mechanics. For a patient on VC, if their lungs become less compliant, delivering the same tidal volume will generate higher pressure, increasing the risk of barotrauma. For a patient on PC, if their lungs become less compliant, the target pressure will be reached at a lower volume, so there is a risk of decreased ventilation (↑PaCO2). Pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC) is a hybrid mode that attempts to overcome this limitation. The target volume is delivered at the lowest possible inspiratory pressure by assessing the delivered tidal volume at the inspiratory pressure during each breath. What about inverse ratio (IR, IRV-PC) ? Increasing the inspiratory time relative to expiratory time increases mean airway pressure. This can be accomplished with pressure-controlled modes, where inspiratory time can be prolonged (normal ratio 1:2, IRV is when inspiratory time is greater than expiratory time). As discussed, MAP affects the surface available for oxygen exchange. This is why IR can be used to optimize oxygenation. Mandatory and Spontaneous Breaths Synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV)- a variation on VC or PC. The machine delivers mandatory breaths, but the patient can also control spontaneous breaths in between the mandatory breaths. Spontaneous Breaths Pressure support- spontaneous mode, the patient initiates breath, the ventilator provides support to overcome the resistance of breathing through the endotracheal tube, flow is adjusted to maintain the inspiratory pressure. The support is terminated when the flow decreases to <25% of peak flow. The patient controls duration and volume. *This is also a setting that can be adjusted in SIMV for assisting spontaneous breaths between ventilator breaths. Airway Pressure Release Ventilation (APRV)- invasive form of ventilation with BiPAP. The patient breaths spontaneously, alternating between a sustained time (time-high) at a set pressure (pressure-high) with a very brief release (time-low) of pressure (pressure low) to allow expiration. The goal is to maintain a higher MAP to optimize oxygenation. Previous Next

< Back ICU Rounding: How I Do It The ICU can be intimidating. Critically ill patients are often surrounded by machines (ventilators, dialysis, etc) and IV poles, with multiple lines and catheters extending from their face, chest, abdomen, neck, and groin. A standardized approach can help the team synthesize and interpret all the subjective and objective data to establish a diagnosis and devise a treatment plan for these complex patients. Rounding in the ICU is different from rounding on floor patients. Floor patients are typically presented in a problem-based format- they are likely to have a short list of active issues being addressed, often just one diagnosis (cholecystitis, bowel obstruction, colon cancer status-post colectomy). Patients can certainly have co-morbidities, such as diabetes and hypertension, but they are usually relatively straightforward. Presentations are briefer than ICU presentations, and largely focus on the acute surgical diagnosis. Here is an example of a surgical floor patient. 32 year old female, hospital day 2 following laparotomy for small bowel obstruction. Her pain is controlled with oral analgesics with minimal prn requirements. She is hungry and passing flatus. She is using her incentive spirometry and ambulating. She has had minimal output in her nasogastric tube. Staples are intact along her midline laparotomy incision with no surrounding erythema and appropriate peri-incisional tenderness. Labs are only remarkable for some mild hypokalemia with K 3.4. She is voiding spontaneously with adequate urine output. Plan to replete potassium, remove NGT and advance diet. In contrast, ICU patients are fragile with more physiologic derangements that threaten homeostasis. Critical illness can profoundly impact multiple organ systems and the interdependence of organ systems adds another layer of complexity. Patients can be presented in a problem-based format, like floor patients, or a system-based format. There are pros and cons to each. As mentioned, a problem-based format addresses each diagnosis (for example- cholecystitis, bowel obstruction, heart failure, pneumonia, ileus). In contrast, a system-based format addresses each organ system (for example- cardiac, pulmonary, renal, neurologic). Problem-based might seem easier on first glance, but one downside in the ICU setting is the risk of overlooking organ systems without a discrete disease process. One downside of the system-based format is the categorization of one diagnosis to various organ systems. For example, ventilator-associated pneumonia is related to the pulmonary system but overlaps with infectious disease. However, the system-based format is comprehensive and thorough, which helps ensure that all physiologic processes are considered. One advantage of the system-based format is it’s adaptability to less complex patients. While it’s challenging to apply floor round formatting to the ICU setting, once you understand how to utilize the ICU system-based model, you can use it to briefly review non-ICU patients to ensure that you don’t forget something. For a young male with cholecystitis, you don’t need to report GCS, medication infusion rates, ventilator settings, insulin requirements, etc. But the systems are still pertinent- address pain (neuro), ensure normal vitals (cardiac) and use of incentive spirometer (pulmonary), check oral intake, assess return of bowel function and examine wounds (GI), inquire about adequate urination and review BMP (renal), ensure no fever, review CBC (heme and ID), and ensure ambulation/ SCDs (prophylaxis). ICU care is a team endeavor, requiring the integration of nursing, respiratory therapy (RT), dieticians, pharmacists, physical therapy and other team members to provide comprehensive care. ICUs must implement a system to integrate care plans between all team members. This can occur in different formats, either with “prerounds” (brief discussion with multidisciplinary team about each patient before formal rounds) or with multidisciplinary rounds (team members present their key data points/ plans in a structured format). One example of multi-disciplinary rounds (abbreviated): resident reports one-liner (see example below); nurse reports their assessments (pain/ sedation scores, delirium assessment, etc); RT reports current ventilator settings, results of spontaneous breathing trials and respiratory treatments; the resident then presents the patient as below. Order of Presentation during Rounds 1. Brief one-liner [presented by the resident, APP or student caring for the patient]. See below. 2. Bedside nurse- report on sedation, pain, infusion rates, etc 3. Respiratory therapy- report on ventilator settings, respiratory interventions, etc 4. Formal patient presentation [presented by the resident, APP or student caring for the patient]. See below. 5. Pharmacist- review of medications, including potential dose adjustments, antibiotic tailoring, etc 6. Attending 7. FAST-HUG- ensure that key aspects of care are addressed (feeding, analgesia, sedation, thromboprophylaxis, head of bed elevated, ulcer prophylaxis, glycemic control) 8. Readback- nurse briefly summarizes the key goals of the day One-liner: brief patient history, acute overnight events. Example: 32 year old male, POD 7 exploratory laparotomy following motor vehicle collision, remains intubated for VAP. Formal Patient Presentation [Systems Based] Neurologic (Neuro) Diagnosis: Exam/ objective data. GCS, reflexes, pupils. ICP monitor. Medication: continuous infusions, requirements of prn analgesics Plan: Neuro- patient remains intubated and sedated, GCS 11T off sedation, currently on Fentanyl @ 100 mcg/ hr and propofol @ 20. Minimal requirements of prn analgesics. We will wean fentanyl infusion and use enteral multi-modal analgesia. Cardiac Diagnosis: Exam/ objective data. Vitals: describe the trend, know when outliers occurred (for example, an isolated heart rate (HR) of 130 during a procedure at noon the previous day is different from a sustained HR of 130s). If patient has any invasive monitoring, such as arterial pressure waveform analysis (FloTrac, Vigileo), pulmonary artery catheter or central line, include these as well. Medication: Plan: Cardiac: HR 90s-100s, Flotrac shows normal SVV. On norepinephrine, requirement is currently down to only 2 from a max of 10 yesterday, MAP goal of >65. Continue to wean norepinephrine. Remove arterial line once off norepinephrine for 12 hours. Pulmonary (Pulm) Diagnosis: Exam/ objective data: intubated, secretions, breath sounds, breathing pattern. Ventilator settings. Labs: ABG if performed. Imaging: note findings, and describe how it’s changed relative to prior imaging Medication: Plan: Example: Pulm- pt remains intubated, current ventilator settings. CXR still shows bilateral fluffy infiltrates. *on antibiotics day x of x for VAP, CXR worsening/ stable, secretions improving. Then, later: ID- patient is on antibiotics day x of x for UTI, and day x of x for VAP. Gastrointestinal (GI)/ Nutrition Diagnosis: Exam/ objective data: abdominal wounds, drains, stool management system, bowel function, nutrition. Medication: bowel regimen Plan: GI- patient started on tube feeds two days ago, but he’s having minimal stool output. Abdomen is distended and tympanitic. We held feeds this morning and have an abdominal plain film pending. Renal/ Fluids/ Electrolytes (Renal) Diagnosis: Exam/ objective data. IV fluids. Intake/ output. BMP. Medication: Plan: Renal- foley in place with good urine output, I/O 3.2L/2.9L. No continuous IV fluids. Electrolytes within normal limits. Hematologic (Heme) Diagnosis: Exam/ objective data. Labs: Hgb, Plt. Transfusion. Medication: Plan: Heme- stable mild anemia, checking CBC every Monday/ Wednesday/ Friday. Infectious Disease (ID) Diagnosis: Exam/ objective data. Labs: WBC, neutrophils. Culture results (sample source, date, results). Medication: current antimicrobials. Plan: ID- patient is on antibiotics day 2/5 for UTI, and day 2/5 for VAP. He has remained afebrile for the last 48 hrs. His WBC is downtrending. No pending cultures. Endocrine (Endo) Diagnosis: Exam/ objective data. Labs: glucose trend, insulin requirements Medication: Plan: Endo- stress hyperglycemia, glucose range from 210-240. Currently on SSI with 24 hr requirement of 22U. Increase to more aggressive sliding scale, but holding off adding scheduled/ basal insulin while adjusting his enteral nutrition. Prophylaxis/ Lines and Tubes GI prophylaxis DVT prophylaxis Location/ date of invasive lines and tubes Patient is on IV PPI for ulcer prophylaxis, on enoxaparin BID. PICC RUE, day 10. Foley, day 5. Helpful hints: - Be succinct and synthesize the data. Have all the information available if asked, but don’t report every single bit of data. - Some problems can be relevant to multiple systems. For example, ventilator-associated pneumonia is related to the pulmonary system but overlaps with infectious disease. You can pick one system to discuss it, but you can also briefly mention it in the other relevant system. For example: Pulmonary- patient remains intubated, on antibiotics day x of x for VAP, CXR worsening/ stable, secretions improving. Then, later: ID- patient is on antibiotics day x of x for UTI, and day x of x for VAP. - If the patient’s BMP is normal, you can state that instead of reading every value. If there is one lab value that is abnormal but the remainder is normal, you can say “normal except for [elevated potassium of 5.5]” - Be thoughtful about ordering labs and imaging. Daily CXR purely because a patient is intubated for a bad TBI is not necessarily helpful. Even if the patient is being treated for pneumonia, daily CXR is unlikely to change your management unless there is a clinical change. CXR is appropriate if there are specific interventions that were performed or if the patient has a clinical deterioration- for example, following placement of chest tube for pleural effusion, following 24 hours of aggressive diuresis, for evaluation of acute dyspnea/ hypoxia. - Don’t repeat information presented by other team members- if the nurse has already provided infusion rates or RT has already provided ventilator settings, just move through the next part of the presentation. ICU Rounds .pdf Download PDF • 46KB A-F Bundle .pdf Download PDF • 33KB Previous Next