Advanced Practice Nurses to begin coming to Code Blues and supervising residents Code Blue: Who's in Charge? < Back Advanced Practice Nurses to begin coming to Code Blues and supervising residents I recently came across this article on Twitter and wrote my reply as soon as I read it. But as I was preparing to post this, I did a little more background research on the article. Let's start with the source- the website is called "MidlevelWTF ". The tagline is- "Exposing midlevel incompetence in the fight to ensure patient safety and preserve physician-led, physician-supervised medicine." The author's user name/ Twitter handle is MidlevelWTF; motto: "an actual doctor, with an actual MD." In light of this, the tone of the article makes much more sense. I'm disgusted to discover that a physician has dedicated their time/ energy to specifically target and defame APPs. Reply I disagree with a policy that formally designates a nurse practitioner to supervise any resident who runs a code. It's not appropriate to assign anyone else the authority to unilaterally overrule the decisions of the code leader. Codes need 1 leader- this is typically not the most junior person in the room, but someone in the middle or upper level of their training- a midlevel or senior resident. This doesn’t mean leaders can’t get recommendations from others. The more senior personnel in the room are welcome to provide advice- if there is egregious incompetence, which I would guess is the exception far more than the rule, someone, such as an attending or fellow or senior resident, can take over the role as leader. Working with the premise that the leader is competent, correcting a mistaken dose, helping develop a differential and general troubleshooting are all in the patient's best interest. These are also integral to closed-loop communication, and shouldn't be considered undermining or met with resistance. Team members should be able to speak up freely without having to worry about being yelled at for correcting another provider who is potentially more senior. The problem with this policy lies in the disruption of the team dynamics- adding another layer of "leadership" by formally assigning someone to have authority over the team leader creates confusion. If there is a contradiction, does the team listen to the leader or the "assigned" supervisor, who could reasonably have less experience than the resident? I've gladly welcomed advice from those with more experience than me during a difficult situation, and I trust them to speak up if they see something amiss. I trust all the non-physicians who care for our patients in my absence, and I trust them to call me if there is any concern; I hope they will feel empowered to do this in a code situation as well. So I support the author's general stance that the policy is inappropriate. However...I take great offense at this article. Implying that nurse practitioners (NPs) are minimally qualified and poorly educated is insulting and severely erroneous. Worst of all, the writer implied that a midlevel might decide to call it quits on a code “because they didn't feel like doing it anymore.” Absolutely inflammatory. Implying that any healthcare professional would be lazy or bored and just give up is preposterous. I have worked with many APPs (advanced practice providers), which includes NPs and PAs (physicians assistants) in the ER, on the inpatient wards, in the operating room, in the ICU, and in clinic. I have found them to be phenomenal teammates, motivated and eager to continually learn about how to best care for patients. Yes, some are less competent than others. But this is equally true of all healthcare professionals. I would gladly have a competent NP run a code if they were at the bedside at felt comfortable/ empowered to do so. While I would never designate a non-physician to oversee a resident running a code, I would similarly never expect a resident to take over the role of team leader from a competent NP or PA. As a fellow, during my time in the ICU, I would gladly let either an APP or a resident run the code, depending on availability and comfort level. I would be readily available and provide input when needed such as when the decision-making process extends past the algorithm of ACLS and into specific patient scenarios. In addition, if the patient needed an emergent/ urgent procedure, I was free to perform or assist while those procedures were being performed, as the NP/PA or resident continued to manage the overall code situation (meds, compressions, US to examine for cardiac activity, calling for MTP, etc). So I disagree with the policy, but I am deeply disappointed in the way the author chose to make petty accusations to undermine APPs and justify their disagreement with the policy. It's disappointing that a professional would stoop low enough to attack the character of our teammates. Previous Next

< Back Vent Mgmt #5: Weaning When is the patient ready to start ventilator weaning? Resolution of pathology resulting in the need for mechanical ventilation Able to assess mental status (ie can the patient follow commands) Hemodynamics and respiratory physiology is optimized (ie ABG normalized or returned to patients baseline, and normalization or stabilization of cardiac function) Minimal ventilator settings (FiO2 21%, PEEP 5) NOTE: Even if there is no immediate plan to extubate, sedation holiday and spontaneous breathing trials should still be performed [unless there are specific contraindications] Spontaneous breathing trial Spontaneous mode of ventilation (such as pressure support or CPAP) with 5-8 cm H2O support during inspiration (basically overcoming the force required to breath through the small diameter of the ETT) Failing SBT Hemodynamic instability (hypotension or hypertension, tachycardia or bradycardia) Agitation Respiratory instability (hypoxia, inadequate tidal volume, tachypnea or decreased respiratory rate) Extubation parameters- how do we know if the patient is ready to be liberated from the ventilator? Able to generate adequate minute ventilation Rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI)- RR/ TV. High respiratory rate (rapid) and low tidal volume (shallow) are more suggestive that a patient isn't appropriate for extubation. Value <105 suggests the patient will successfully extubate. This is also known as the Tobin index.[1] Negative inspiratory force (NIF)- the patient's ability to generate negative pressure with inhalation. Cuff leak- ability to move air around the endotracheal tube. Not mandatory to evaluate for cuff leak prior to extubate EXCEPT for patients is at high risk for airway edema (traumatic intubation, intubated >6 days, large ETT, female, reintubation after unplanned extubation). Reasons for failed ventilator weaning Prolonged hospitalization and associated weakness Hypophosphatemia Primary process requiring mechanical ventilation is unresolved Passed SBT...but failed ventilator liberation? Excess secretions/ inability to cough Cardiac instability related to physiological changes with loss of positive pressure (specifically decrease in intra-thoracic pressure leading to decreased cardiac output) Tobin Index. Yang KL, Tobin MJ. A Prospective Study of Indexes Predicting the Outcome of Trials of Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation. N Engl J Med. 1991 May 23;324(21):1445-50. Previous Next

< Back Gallbladder Disease Cholecystectomy (gallbladder removal) is one of the most common operative procedures performed. What does the gallbladder do? Your gallbladder stores bile and enzymes from the liver. When you eat, your gallbladder squeezes to drain bile into the intestines to help you digest food. What are the reasons for cholecystectomy? Symptomatic cholelithiasis. If gallstones are present, they can lead to increased pressure and pain when the gallbladder contracts. Typically occurs with a fatty meal. Pain can last minutes to hours. Acute cholecystitis. When the gallbladder drainage is blocked by gallstones, it can become acutely inflamed. Symptoms are similar to symptomatic cholelithiasis, but the symptoms don't resolve. Source: UpToDate Images: Anatomy of the Gallbladder What does surgery entail? What are the risks of the procedure? Your gallbladder is under your liver. Laparoscopic surgery is typically done with an incision at your belly button and 3 incisions under your ribs on the right upper abdomen. There is a risk of pain, bleeding, and infection with any surgical procedure. Specific to this procedure, there is a risk of damage to surrounding organs, including the liver and intestines. The worst-case scenario is damage to the tube that drains from the liver into the small intestine, called the common bile duct. This complication is infrequent, but if it occurs, you will need more procedures and a longer hospital stay. If we can't see things safely laparoscopically, we will proceed with an open incision under your ribs on the right. This is not common with elective surgery and is more likely in elderly diabetic patients with acute severe inflammation. *IOC- there is an additional procedure that we will perform that shows us the bile ducts and allows us to see if there are any stones in the bile duct that can cause obstruction. What can I expect post-operatively? You will have several small incisions from the laparoscopic port sites. They will have absorbable sutures, nothing that needs to be removed. You will have glue or gauze and paper tape on the incisions. The glue will peel off on its own in 10-14 days. If you have gauze, you can remove this in two days and shower like normal. You will have paper tape strips on the incision, and these will peel off on their own. You are at risk for a hernia through the small incisions, so avoid heavy lifting for 4 weeks after surgery. You may take acetaminophen (Tylenol) and ibuprofen (Motrin) as needed for pain. These can be taken at the same time. Take the narcotic pain medication if your pain is severe despite the acetaminophen and ibuprofen. After the few first days, you should work on decreasing the number of narcotics that you are taking. What can I eat after surgery? There are no specific dietary restrictions. However, if you eat a fatty meal, it may cause loose stool (diarrhea) until your body adjusts to not having your gallbladder, which previously stored the chemicals used to digest fatty food. This is seen in about 10% of patients and usually resolves. If it lasts more than a few weeks, there are medication options to treat this. What should I be worried about after surgery? If you have fever >101 F, severe nausea/ vomiting, inability to tolerate liquids, severe abdominal pain, increasing redness, or drainage from your incisions. UpToDate Patient Education Patient education: Gallstones (Beyond the Basics) Patient Information from Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Gallbladder Removal Surgery (Cholecystectomy) American College of Surgeons Operation Brochures Cholecystectomy: Surgical Removal of the Gallbladder Previous Next

1st day in radiology: your right is your left, your left is your right Radiologic Dyslexia < Back 1st day in radiology: your right is your left, your left is your right I have recently coined a new phrase. While showing my mom a picture, pointing out someone she had never met before, I commented, "he's the one on the right." Funny story, though- he was actually on the left side of the picture. I had to pause while I talked to my mom and reassure her that I know the difference between my right and my left. While scrolling through Twitter the other day, I was reviewing a question posed about an abdominal x-ray. Another Twitter user added a helpful hint by indicating "the right side of the circle" when pointing out an abnormality. I predicted he meant anatomical right (meaning the image's left side) based on my interpretation. We chuckled about the discrepancy between radiographic laterality and left-right differentiation in real life. I decided to designate this mix-up "radiologic dyslexia." Feel free to use this in the appropriate context! Previous Next

< Back Pulmonary Embolism...pending Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism Previous Next

< Back Getting Involved Getting involved in your training program and hospital is crucial for your professional development and growth. Here are some tips to help you get started. - Be open to opportunities to get involved early and embrace small projects. Even if a project seems insignificant, it can lead to bigger opportunities. Don't hesitate to accept requests to help write a paper, design a research protocol, or participate in a committee. These small projects can open doors for more significant roles and responsibilities in the future. - Be proactive and take the initiative to get involved. Talk to your mentors and program directors about your interest in participating in projects or committees. Ask for guidance on how to get involved, and don't be afraid to express your interest in specific areas. - Get involved in research. You don’t have to have a strong research background to contribute to ongoing projects. If you have specific research interests, seek the advice of someone with a similar interest and collaborate with them. Different faculty members will have their individual strengths and passions, which are frequently apparent after you interact with them. If you partner up with someone who has a similar interest, they will be able to guide you and lend their support to your project. Training programs frequently have requirements for research and have a framework for supporting involvement in ongoing projects. Research requirements are often a part of training programs, so take advantage of the support and resources available to you. Also, keep in mind that there may be ongoing research projects at your hospital that you can contribute to. - Attend department and hospital level conferences. Grand rounds, morbidity and mortality (M&M) and case conferences are invaluable learning opportunities. Conferences that review complications or deaths are invaluable learning opportunities. They are also a good platform for developing performance improvement projects. Many patient incidents are multifactorial, and there are frequently systems issues that can be addressed to minimize repeat events. - Join committees. Committees are a great way to learn about the inner workings of the hospital and contribute to important decision-making processes. They also provide a venue to meet colleagues in other departments and gain valuable networking experience. - Talk to people. Reach out to your mentors, program directors, and research staff about other opportunities that may be available. They can often provide valuable insight and connections that can lead to new opportunities and projects. After you have explored the opportunities to get involved in your program and hospital, it’s time to widen your professional network. Expanding beyond your hospital will help you stay current with industry trends, discover new opportunities, and establish relationships with colleagues and mentors. One way to do this is by participating in surgical organizations at the national level. Here are some examples: - American College of Surgeons (ACS). The ACS offers membership and participation opportunities starting in medical school. As a member, you can take advantage of educational programs, networking events, and leadership development opportunities. Fellowship in the ACS (FACS) requires board certification, and it is a prestigious recognition that can enhance your professional reputation. - American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST). AAST is the premier national organization for the field of acute care surgery (trauma, surgical critical care and emergency general surgery). There are numerous opportunities for involvement in research and professional development. Membership requires FACS status. However, the organization recently added an associate membership category, which offers younger surgeons an opportunity to participate in the AAST's activities and programs. - The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST). EAST provides leadership and development opportunities for young surgeons who are actively involved in the care of injured patients. The organization offers ample opportunities to get involved in committees, research projects, mentorship, and leadership roles. This is far from an exhaustive list, but it is a good starting point for young surgeons to explore how they want to develop their network. During my Acute Care Surgery fellowship, I was able to get involved in various research projects and initiatives that allowed me to further develop my expertise and knowledge in the field. At the start of my fellowship, I developed a research protocol that evaluated the impact of legislation on the opiate epidemic. This project allowed me to delve into a critical issue facing the healthcare industry and explore potential solutions to mitigate the epidemic's impact. Shortly after, I attended a department committee that updated our clinical practice guidelines. As we discussed some recent patients with rib fractures, I saw the importance of updating our thoracic trauma management guidelines. I partnered with one of the faculty who had a particular focus on rib fracture management and we worked to optimize our protocol for caring for these patients. This led to multiple opportunities, including an IRB protocol and two manuscript submissions on operative rib fixation. I also had the opportunity to co-author a book chapter on Intensive Care Unit (ICU) management of blunt chest trauma and a manuscript on the use of opiates in chest trauma. During a meeting with one of the research directors in our department, I was able to learn about opportunities to get involved in ongoing projects. This led to me joining a group working on coagulopathy in traumatic brain injury. Through this project, I was able to contribute to a literature review submission and co-author a research manuscript submission. I was also able to present our findings at a national conference. My program director was a strong supporter of and actively shared news about opportunities that could further my career development. One of these opportunities included writing an essay that allowed me to publish and present at a conference. After reading my essay, a critical care physician reached out to connect and invited me to participate in testing a tool for resuscitation in austere environments. This was a unique opportunity that allowed me to apply my knowledge and skills in a new and challenging setting. Overall, my Acute Care Surgery fellowship allowed me to explore different avenues in research and develop expertise in areas that I am passionate about. It also enabled me to collaborate with other experts in the field, broaden my network, and gain invaluable experiences that served me well in my future career endeavors. Previous Next

12 < Back Other Resources Radiology Radiopaedia.org . Open-edit radiology resource, compiled by radiologists and other health professionals from across the globe. How to Read a Chest X-Ray: The Graphic Novel and Drawing Book. Download this “Dummies Guide” to reading chest x-rays and brush up on the basics. Appropriateness Criteria. Evidence-based guidelines to assist providers in making the most appropriate imaging or treatment decision for a specific clinical condition. Acute Right Upper Quadrant Pain Acute Right Lower Quadrant Pain Previous Next

< Back Interpreting Chest X-Rays Developing skill with radiographic interpretation requires practice. Look at every film for your patients. Practice by looking at normal films, then compare between normal and abnormal. For example, compare an image for a patient with a normal cardiac silhouette and compare it with a patient with an abnormal silhouette with a widened mediastinum. This is NOT an exhaustive list of everything that can be seen on a chest x-ray, but is an overview of common pathology that can be seen. How to read a film 1. Identify- correct patient/ date/ time. 2. Identify orientation. Is the projection posterior-anterior (PA) or anterior-posterior (AP)? Is the patient rotated? PA is when the patient stands with their chest facing the x-ray cassette and the x-ray is behind the patient, so the x-ray beam travels from the posterior of the patient toward the plate, which is situated on the patients anterior surface. AP is when the patient’s back is towards the board and the x-ray is in from front of the patient, so the x-ray beam travels from the anterior of the patient toward the plate, which is situated on the patient’s posterior. This is the orientation when a patient is laying supine in the trauma bay. On an AP film, the heart appears enlarged compared to the PA. Rotated- compare bilateral or midline structures, such as clavicles and the spinous processes of the vertebra. If the clavicles are asymmetric or the spinous processes are not midline, the patient is rotated. Structures (ABCs) 1. Airway Is the trachea midline? Are there any opacities in the lung fields- pneumonia, masses, bilateral haziness? Do the lung markings extend to the edge of the chest? If not, and the space area is dark, this is suggestive of a pneumothorax. In contrast, if the space is white, this is suggestive of a fluid collection (hemothorax, infected fluid, etc). Is there evidence of fluid? This depends on the patient’s postion and the consistency of the fluid. Free fluid (fresh hemothorax, pleural effusion) will layer dependently, so if the patient is upright, the costophrenic angles will be blunted. If the patient is supine, the fluid can cause generalized opacity of the lung field because it layers along the back of the patient. 2. Bones- examine for fracture, dislocation, masses (tumor) Upper extremity/ shoulder? Ribs? Vertebra? 3. Cardiac Silhouette size/ contour? Normal is <1/2 the size of the thoracic cavity Evidence of aortic injury? *Bonus- 3 places for blunt aortic injury- aortic root, diaphragm, and isthmus just past subclavian takeoff Widened mediastinum (supine >8 cm or upright > 6cm) Loss of aortopulmonary window Abnormal aortic contour Depressed left mainstem bronchus Left apical capping Left hemothorax Nasogastric tube deviation Widened paraspinal or paratracheal stripe 4. Diaphragm Elevated- symmetric elevation is consistent with poor inspiratory volume. Blunting of costophrenic angle- effusion. Abdominal contents in chest (ie gastric bubble in the left chest)- consistent with diaphragm injury or defect. 5. Everything else Air in soft tissue- many potential etiologies, but common causes include pneumothorax or esophageal/ airway disruption. Air under the diaphragm (pneumoperitoneum)- concerning for hollow viscus injury. Iatrogenic foreign bodies- endotracheal tube, central lines, ports, pacemaker, endovascular grafts, esophageal stents, feeding tubes Non-iatrogenic foreign bodies- swallowed objects Additional References and Images from Radiopaedia.org **Click on Cases and figures and Imaging differential diagnosis on the right-hand column of each page for more in-depth explanations of specific pathology** Radiopaedia Airway Bones and Soft Tissue Cardiac Silhouette and Mediastinum Widened Mediastinum Hemothorax Pneumothorax Nasogastric Tube Position Previous Next

6 Tips to Be More Comfortable with Uncomfortable Conversations Giving Bad News < Back 6 Tips to Be More Comfortable with Uncomfortable Conversations It's not fun to tell families (or patients) that there was a complication, that their loved one died, or that their loved one is not going to survive. But it's a fundamental principle of good patient care, especially in the specialties of trauma and critical care. I didn't become truly comfortable with these conversations until my critical care fellowship. After many years and countless conversations in private rooms, here are my tips on how to develop this skill. 1. Experience. It's uncomfortable, but you should take every opportunity to participate in these conversations, starting as a student/ trainee. - As a young resident, I remember walking with my attending to go talk to a family about an intra-operative complication. I'll never forget the sinking feeling in my chest, the shame that I made a mistake. This was a pivotal moment in my training. My attending didn't have to tell me I messed up. But he knew I needed to see how he handled disclosing to the family members. He showed me that this wasn't something that I should allow to crush my self-confidence. - A few years later, during one of my first trauma rotations, I remember sitting in a small room in the ER as one of my co-residents told a family that their child was the victim of a fatal shooting. I didn't have much experience telling families that their loved one had died. In particular, I didn't have any exposure to telling a family that their loved one died in a trauma bay- a family I'd never met, a family who never had a chance to see their loved one before they died from their injuries. I was initially embarrassed that my co-resident, who was one year younger than me, was more comfortable leading the discussion than I was. But then I realized he had much more exposure to that type of conversation because of his previous trauma rotations. So I took it as an opportunity to learn and prepare myself to lead the conversation the next time. - Two years later, in the ICU waiting room of the same hospital where I watched my (younger) co-resident tell a family their son died, I sat with the mother of a young man who was critically injured. Thankfully, I had much better news. But still, it's not easy to tell a single mother that her oldest son was shot through the chest, and was laying in the ICU, intubated, with an open chest and abdomen. 2. Learn from watching experts. - Everyone has a slightly different style of handling these conversations. I joined my attendings for every conversation I had the opportunity to witness. This included conversations about everything from Code Blue incidents to fatal injuries and end-of-life care. It's important to see different styles, which will allow you to develop your style. Some are more blunt, some are more observant of family dynamics, some are overly talkative. There are some you may choose to not replicate, but it's important to see a spectrum of styles to learn what works for you. - I've watched my MICU attending talk with the wife of a man who came to the hospital with acute cardiac arrest, requiring emergent coronary angiography and intervention, then therapeutic hypothermia. I learned how to succinctly describe a complex situation and support a wife make a crucial decision without pressuring her. - I've watched my trauma attending talk to a family of a young male patient who had died on the operating table. I've watched that talk more than once, unfortunately. And it never got more comfortable. But I learned how to convey devastating news while simultaneously expressing compassion. 3. Practice. - As a fellow, I would often have a pre-brief with my attending and we would discuss key points for the meeting, as well as the goals of the discussion (ie deciding about proceeding with surgery, deciding about comfort care, etc). - When I have younger residents who are having family meetings, particularly one's that I haven't worked with before, I have them rehearse their conversations with me before. I did this as a resident and a fellow, and I still do this with my fellows. 4. Get feedback. Positive feedback is always nice, but true constructive feedback is key to improving. - I've had nurses and chaplains who have joined me for multiple family meetings, and it's always reaffirming to hear them compliment my interaction. - My attendings still occasionally joined me in conversations toward the end of my fellowship. It was always helpful to hear feedback about what was well-received and how I could have been more effective. 5. Once you've practiced, developed your style, and absorbed feedback- don't expect it to always be easy. - Towards the end of my fellowship, I had a particularly challenging case. I had already had countless family discussions and had become very comfortable with being uncomfortable. For a variety of reasons, I was emotionally overwhelmed with this patient's situation- I sat and cried at the nurse's station for a long time. Then I went and talked to my attending and told her I couldn't have the conversation, that I couldn't stop crying. I was hoping she would take over and lead the conversation- I should have known I wouldn't get off that easily. She reassured me that I wouldn't have to say much- I had already established rapport with the patient's family the day before, and they'd be able to tell from my non-verbal communication that I didn't have good news. It was (and still is) the hardest conversation I've had. 6. Don't Stifle Your Emotions (within reason) - Some people would criticize me for expressing emotion when having discussions with families. I do think there has to be a healthy separation, and getting emotionally invested with every case would be paralyzing. I don't cry during the majority of these conversations. However, I'm not a robot, and I still occasionally have patients that affect me on a more personal level. For example, I had one family that came to the very difficult decision to transition their mother to comfort care. Their mother was the matriarch of the family and her children didn't want to disrespect her. She had expressed that she would not want to be kept alive if she couldn't continue to have meaningful interactions and care for the family. I told them that giving them the implicit approval to allow her to die peacefully was probably the greatest gift she could have given them, and I reassured them that they were showing her the ultimate level of respect and kindness by honoring her wishes. That hit me differently because I could feel their pain as I imagined myself in their position. Previous Next

< Back ICU Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM): Patient and Family Resources Meet the Critical Care Team Learn about the members of the ICU care team. Patient Communicator Application This free app by SCCM is designed to improve communication between patients, families, and caregivers. Critical Care FAQs Learn about which patients require care in the ICU, what things commonly happen in the ICU, as well as find a more detailed explanation of common medical conditions seen in the ICU. Resource Library The MyICUCare.org Resource Library includes complimentary materials aimed at educating patients and families about the critical care journal, both during an ICU stay and after discharge. Understanding Your ICU Stay: Information and Patients and Families booklet. American Thoracic Society- Patient Education | INFORMATION SERIES Managing the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Experience: A Proactive Guide for Patients and Families Mechanical Ventilation What is Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome? What is ECMO? Central Venous Catheter Arterial Catheterization What is Hemodialysis for Acute Kidney Failure? What is Sepsis? Palliative Care for People with Respiratory Disease or Critical Illness Tracheostomy in Adults Living with a Tracheostomy Venous Thromboembolism- Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) and Pulmonary Embolism (PE) Preventing Venous Thromboembolism [John Hopkins Medicine: Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality ] Previous Next

< Back Mangled Extremity- Keep or Cut? A 42-year-old male was struck by a vehicle as he was crossing the street. He was brought in by EMS. He had a depressed GCS and unequal pupils, and he was intubated for concern for airway compromise. He had a significant injury to the right lower extremity with diffuse bleeding, but no active arterial bleeding. Compressive dressings were applied. He had fluid in the LUQ window of his FAST. He was hemodynamically unstable. Initial evaluation and management? Imaging? Poly-trauma patients demand prioritization and quick decision making, and the simple step-wise algorithms designed for each injury in isolation are less helpful. Patients with blunt abdominal trauma and hemodynamic instability require emergent operative intervention. Patients with a depressed GCS and an abnormal pupil exam require emergent CT imaging to define the severity of their head injury and consultation with neurosurgery. Patients with a mangled extremity require a CT scan to define the vascular injury. In the setting of blunt abdominal trauma, a positive FAST and hemodynamic instability, he was transported to the OR emergently. If there was an option for a rapid CT en route to define his TBI, that would have been ideal. But hypotension is associated with worse outcomes for TBI patients, so the priority is stopping the bleeding. We performed a midline laparotomy, splenectomy, and repaired a diaphragm injury. We placed a temporary abdominal closure. Intraoperative Image What do we do about his mangled lower extremity? Consult vascular or ortho? Ex-fix? Amputate? There are several important tasks. Assessment of injury to neuromuscular structures is vital. If possible, rapid restoration of arterial blood flow is beneficial. However, it is vital to evaluate the need for amputation. This decision requires consideration of current physiologic status, co-morbidities, and baseline functional status. It's sometimes a question of life versus limb. Orthopedic and vascular specialists can be consulted, but it is important not to lose sight of the patient's overall clinical status. A brief temporizing procedure to restore blood flow with a shunt, stabilize bony structures, and preserve any remaining soft tissue may be appropriate, but a lengthy vascular repair and bony fixation are likely not ideal. The patient's baseline functional status, social support, and co-morbidities were unknown. Based on the severity of his extremity injury, high injury burden, and need for urgent head CT, my recommendation was for immediate amputation. This decision requires weighing the risks/ benefits of limb salvage (prolonged time in the operating room for stabilization, risk of ongoing tissue ischemia leading to systemic complications) vs amputation (limb loss). Our orthopedic specialists felt they could salvage his limb, and give him a chance to be an active participant in the decision-making. We agreed to a time limit to minimize operative time, so the limb was stabilized temporarily with a plan for ongoing evaluation of the limb viability. Managment of the Mangled Extremity WTA Algorithm Management of patients with mangled extremities remains controversial. Severe scoring systems have been created, with variable success in predicting who requires amputation. In the acute setting, the trauma surgeon must weigh the risks and benefits of limb salvage versus immediate amputation. If the limb injury is devastating (perhaps only hanging on by a small skin bridge), and the patient has other injuries that require immediate intervention, rapid amputation can be life-saving. If the decision to amputate is less clear, a second opinion from a colleague and orthopedics should be elicited. There have been remarkable advances in the ability to restore function to mangled extremities, and discussion with specialties can be very helpful. "Therapeutic advances in the treatment of vascular, orthopedic, neurologic, and soft tissue injuries have reduced the diagnostic accuracy of the MESS in predicting the need for amputation. There remains a significant need to examine additional predictors of amputation following severe extremity injury." Loja, Melissa N et al. “The mangled extremity score and amputation: Time for a revision.” J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;82(3):518-523 The trauma surgeon must maintain perspective on the whole patient- spending hours doing meticulous vascular or nerve dissection/ repair or extensive orthopedic manipulation can be an intolerable burden on a patient with multiple other injuries. 1. Control active hemorrhage. 2. Restore anatomic limb alignment. 3. Assess distal arterial flow→ evidence of vascular injury→ CTA to characterize injury. 4. Assess neurologic function. Unable to control active hemorrhage or there is hemodynamic instability→ proceed to OR. Assess for the need for immediate amputation. Factors to consider: Complex, segmental, severely comminuted fracture. Large circumferential soft tissue loss or massive soft tissue necrosis. Compartment syndrome with myonecrosis. Nerve disruption. Massive contamination. Prolonged warm ischemia >6 hours. Poor distal anastomosis options. No immediate amputation→ intraluminal shunt to re-establish perfusion. Then assess bony and nerve injury. Evaluate risks/ benefits of limb-preservation. Previous Next

< Back Shakshuka- A North African Dish Ingredients 1 large red bell pepper, thinly sliced 1 large yellow bell pepper, sliced 1 red onion, sliced 3-4 garlic cloves, diced ¾ tsp salt cracked pepper to taste 1 tsp cumin 1 tsp sugar ½ tsp smoked paprika ½ tsp chili flakes 3 medium tomatoes diced small ⅓ c white wine or water 1 T fresh basil ribbons or chopped Italian parsley 4 -6 Extra large organic eggs Other optional additions: crumbled feta or goat cheese 1 C browned chorizo ¼ C finely diced spanish style cured Chorizo or Merguez, a North African spiced sausage Instructions 1. Preheat oven to 400F. 2. In a large cast iron skillet, heat the olive oil over medium heat. Add the onion and cook until tender, about 5 minutes. If adding raw chorizo, brown it with the onions. 3. Add the sliced peppers and garlic, and turn heat down to med-low and cook for 5 more minutes, until peppers are tender. If adding the cured spanish chorizo or Merguez sausage, add it now. Add all spices, sugar and salt. Cook for 2 more minutes. Add fresh tomatoes and white wine. 4. Simmer on low for 15 minutes, adding more water if it gets too dry or thick- you want a stew-like consistency. After tomatoes cook down, taste, it should be full flavored- adjust salt and sugar if necessary. Crack 4-6 eggs over the mixture, sprinkling each egg with salt and cracked pepper. Add crumble goat cheese or feta over the top and place in the 400F oven. 5. Bake until egg whites are cooked (about 7 minutes) and yolks are still soft. Remove from oven and top with fresh basil (or Italian parsley). Serve with toast or crusty bread. Veggies sizzling Previous Ready for the oven Yummy! Next